QQQD ranks 21st and SBB 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SBB
0.0%by weight
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
QQQD 45.5×the volume
68.1K1.5K
QQQD vs SBB Performance
−0.7%−13.7%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SBB 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- SBB $4M
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- SBB −13.7%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SBB 3.33%
- QQQD 3
- SBB 1
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- SBB 1.5K sh
- QQQD $12.18
- SBB $23.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SBB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C43 | C44Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | C45Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SBB are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SBBC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SBB Small-cap bearishness with the dial set to one: SBB aims for the inverse (-1x) of the S&P SmallCap 600's daily move. A sibling fund runs that same index at -2x. This is the plain version, and it has been doing the job since January 2007.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SBB The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the daily performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SBB Holdings
How QQQD and SBB differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QQQD and 0.0% of SBB.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for QQQD and SBB.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SBB.
Concentration
- QQQD5083.3%
- SBB100.0%
- QQQD0
- SBB0
Asset class
- QQQD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SBB
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QQQD0
- In both0
- Only in SBB0
Only in QQQD
0 securities, 0.0% of QQQD by weight
Only in SBB
0 securities, 0.0% of SBB by weight
Weight gaps
QQQD and SBB share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SBB Cost
Overpaying SBB vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SBB 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SBB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%SBB
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SBB 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SBB Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SBB 3.33%
- QQQD $0.41
- SBB $0.78
- QQQD $0.10
- SBB $0.19
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SBB Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SBB Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- SBB Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs SBB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SBB 18.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SBB −0.91
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SBB −39.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35SBB −1.01
QQQD and SBB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
