QQQD ranks 21st and SCC 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SCC
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
QQQD 4.7×the volume
68.1K14.4K
QQQD vs SCC Performance
−0.7%+5.9%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SCC 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- SCC $3M
- QQQD −0.7%
- SCC +5.9%, better
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SCC 2.75%
- QQQD 3
- SCC 1
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- SCC 14.4K sh
- QQQD $12.18
- SCC $14.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SCC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | C43 | B55Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | C45Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SCC are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SCCC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SCC The only -2x ETF pointed at the consumer discretionary sector, and it has been listed since 2007. SCC resets daily, so it is built as a short-horizon trading tool, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SCC The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to negative two times the daily performance of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SCC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SCC Cost
Overpaying SCC vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SCC 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SCC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%SCC
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SCC 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SCC Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SCC 2.75%
- QQQD $0.41
- SCC $0.41
- QQQD $0.10
- SCC $0.11
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SCC Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SCC Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- SCC Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs SCC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SCC 34.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SCC −0.88
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SCC −78.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35SCC −2.25
QQQD and SCC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
