QQQD ranks 21st and SIJ 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SIJ
0.0%by weight
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
QQQD 7.4×the volume
68.1K9.24K
QQQD vs SIJ Performance
0.0%−16.9%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SIJ 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- SIJ $2M
- QQQD 0.0%, better
- SIJ −16.9%
- QQQD 3.32%, better
- SIJ 3.29%
- QQQD 3
- SIJ 1
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- SIJ 9.24K sh
- QQQD $12.39
- SIJ $18.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SIJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | C43Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | C41Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SIJ are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SIJC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SIJ Wall Street's only two-times inverse play on the industrials sector in ETF form: one ticker, machinery-to-airlines exposure flipped upside down, reset at the end of every trading day since 2007.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SIJ SIJ seeks, before fees and expenses, daily investment results equal to twice the inverse of the S&P Industrials Select Sector Index’s daily performance. It is intended to gain when the industrials sector declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SIJ Holdings
How QQQD and SIJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QQQD and 0.0% of SIJ.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for QQQD and SIJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SIJ.
Concentration
- QQQD3985.4%
- SIJ100.0%
- QQQD0
- SIJ0
Asset class
- QQQD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SIJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QQQD0
- In both0
- Only in SIJ0
Only in QQQD
0 securities, 0.0% of QQQD by weight
Only in SIJ
0 securities, 0.0% of SIJ by weight
Weight gaps
QQQD and SIJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SIJ Cost
Overpaying SIJ vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SIJ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SIJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%SIJ
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SIJ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SIJ Dividends
- QQQD 3.32%, better
- SIJ 3.29%
- QQQD $0.41
- SIJ $0.61
- QQQD $0.10
- SIJ $0.13
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SIJ Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SIJ Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- SIJ Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs SIJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SIJ 31.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SIJ −1.08
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SIJ −78.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35SIJ −1.77
QQQD and SIJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
