SJB ranks 5th and QQQD 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SJB
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
SJB 2.2×the volume
68.1K147K
QQQD vs SJB Performance
−0.7%+3.2%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SJB 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- SJB $68M
- QQQD −0.7%
- SJB +3.2%, better
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SJB 3.23%
- QQQD 3
- SJB 2
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- SJB 147K sh, better
- QQQD $12.18
- SJB $15.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SJB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | D38 | B65Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SJB are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SJBB
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SJB One of the few single-ticker ways to take the other side of the junk bond market: SJB aims for the inverse (-1x) of the daily move in the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SJB The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SJB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SJB Cost
Overpaying SJB vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SJB 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SJB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%SJB
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SJB 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SJB Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SJB 3.23%
- QQQD $0.41
- SJB $0.50
- QQQD $0.10
- SJB $0.12
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SJB Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SJB Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- SJB Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs SJB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SJB 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SJB −1.46
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SJB −13.3%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35SJB −0.68
QQQD and SJB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
