SRS ranks 14th and QQQD 20th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SRS
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
QQQD 4.6×the volume
65.9K14.3K
QQQD vs SRS Performance
−5.0%−17.2%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SRS 0.95%
- QQQD $27M
- SRS $16M
- QQQD −5.0%, better
- SRS −17.2%
- QQQD 3.38%
- SRS 3.39%, better
- QQQD 4
- SRS 2
- QQQD 65.9K sh, better
- SRS 14.3K sh
- QQQD $12.56
- SRS $39.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | C43 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | |
| Durability | D39 | B56Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SRS are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SRSB
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SRS The one-ticker way to lean against US real estate with leverage: SRS targets twice the inverse of the S&P 500's real estate sector, recalculated every single day. It has been running since 2007, just as the housing market cracked.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SRS The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse performance of the S&P Real Estate Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SRS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SRS Cost
Overpaying SRS vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SRS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SRS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%SRS
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SRS 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SRS Dividends
- QQQD 3.38%
- SRS 3.39%, better
- QQQD $0.41
- SRS $1.31
- QQQD $0.10
- SRS $0.33
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SRS Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SRS Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- SRS Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs SRS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SRS 33.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SRS −0.59
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SRS −54.8%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.38SRS −1.87
QQQD and SRS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
