QQQM ranks 1st of 10 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Category.
QQQM vs VGT
VGT −0.06pt a year
0.15%0.09%
VGT 1.4×the volume
3.01M4.23M
VGT +4.5pt
+14.3%+18.8%
QQQM vs VGT Performance
+95.2%+136.3%
- QQQM 0.15%
- VGT 0.09%, better
- QQQM $109B
- VGT $178B
- QQQM +15.2%
- VGT +24.7%, better
- QQQM 0.44%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- QQQM 105
- VGT 321
- QQQM 3.01M sh
- VGT 4.23M sh, better
- QQQM $293.18
- VGT $122.79
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A92 |
| Mission | A100 | A84 |
| Risk | C49 | B55 |
| Tradability | A88 | B57 |
| Holdings | B61 | C41 |
| Durability | A76 | A93 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
VGT ranks 3rd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
Our read on each fund
QQQMA
VGTA
In short
QQQM The Nasdaq-100 in a thriftier wrapper. Launched in 2020, QQQM holds the same index as Invesco's famous original and charges 0.15% a year instead of 0.18%, built for people who buy and sit rather than trade.
VGT Vanguard's technology sleeve, indexed since 2004: roughly 300 US tech stocks running from megacap giants down to small caps, for 0.09% a year. Broad coverage of the sector rather than just its household names.
Stated mandate
QQQM The Fund seeks to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index before fees and expenses by generally investing at least 90% of its assets in index securities.
VGT The fund seeks to track an index measuring the investment return of information technology stocks. It uses an indexing approach for large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. technology companies and normally invests at least 80% of assets in target-index stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQM vs VGT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQM vs VGT Cost
Overpaying QQQM vs VGT
$1,239
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQM 0.15%
$3,137
VGT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQM | VGT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $165 | $109 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $646 | $425 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,898 | $1,239 |
- 0.15%QQQM
- 0.09%VGT, cheaper
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
QQQM among 10 Nasdaq-100 funds
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 funds
- Median 0.20%
QQQM 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
VGT among 23 Technology (Broad) funds
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
VGT 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
QQQM vs VGT Dividends
- QQQM 0.44%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- QQQM $1.32
- VGT $0.47
- QQQM $0.31
- VGT $0.15
- QQQM Sep 21, 2026
- VGT Sep 23, 2026
- QQQM Sep 25, 2026
- VGT Sep 25, 2026
- QQQM Quarterly
- VGT Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQM vs VGT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QQQM
- VGT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQM 17.2%, betterVGT 21.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQM 1.27VGT 1.30, better
- Worst fall
- QQQM −35.0%, betterVGT −35.1%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQM 1.23VGT 1.35
QQQM and VGT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.18%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.




