XLK ranks 1st and VGT 3rd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
VGT vs XLK
XLK −0.01pt a year
0.09%0.08%
XLK 2.0×the volume
4.23M8.32M
VGT +0.1pt
+24.6%+24.5%
VGT vs XLK Performance
+136.3%+146.4%
- VGT 0.09%
- XLK 0.08%, better
- VGT $178B
- XLK $123B
- VGT +24.7%
- XLK +27.1%, better
- VGT 0.38%
- XLK 0.44%, better
- VGT 321
- XLK 77
- VGT 4.23M sh
- XLK 8.32M sh, better
- VGT $122.79
- XLK $186.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A84Higher | A76 |
| Risk | B55 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | C41 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A82 |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. VGT and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VGTA
XLKA
In short
VGT Vanguard's technology sleeve, indexed since 2004: roughly 300 US tech stocks running from megacap giants down to small caps, for 0.09% a year. Broad coverage of the sector rather than just its household names.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
VGT The fund seeks to track an index measuring the investment return of information technology stocks. It uses an indexing approach for large-, mid-, and small-capitalization U.S. technology companies and normally invests at least 80% of assets in target-index stocks.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VGT vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VGT vs XLK Cost
Overpaying VGT vs XLK
$209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VGT 0.09%
$1,898
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VGT | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $147 | $18 |
| 20 | $646 | $575 | $71 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,689 | $209 |
- 0.09%VGT
- 0.08%XLK, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
VGT 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
VGT vs XLK Dividends
- VGT 0.38%
- XLK 0.44%, better
- VGT $0.47
- XLK $0.83
- VGT $0.15
- XLK $0.22
- VGT Sep 23, 2026
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- VGT Sep 25, 2026
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- VGT Quarterly
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
VGT vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VGT
- XLK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VGT 21.6%, betterXLK 22.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- VGT 1.30, betterXLK 1.23
- Worst fall
- VGT −35.1%XLK −33.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- VGT 1.35XLK 1.35Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





