USRT ranks 1st and RDOG 10th of 21 funds in the US Real Estate Category.
RDOG vs USRT
USRT −0.27pt a year
0.35%0.08%
USRT 675.2×the volume
1.17K787K
USRT +2.3pt
+4.2%+6.5%
RDOG vs USRT Performance
+3.5%+17.7%
- RDOG 0.35%
- USRT 0.08%, better
- RDOG $11M
- USRT $4.29B
- RDOG +15.5%, better
- USRT +13.9%
- RDOG 6.41%, better
- USRT 2.75%
- RDOG 46
- USRT 126
- RDOG 1.17K sh
- USRT 787K sh, better
- RDOG $38.38
- USRT $63.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RDOG | USRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C49 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D33 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Real Estate funds
Same Category. RDOG and USRT are both graded against the same 21 US Real Estate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RDOGB
USRTA
In short
RDOG Most real estate ETFs just buy the sector by size. RDOG flips it: the highest-yielding REITs inside each of nine property segments, weighted equally, so the biggest landlords don't automatically run the portfolio.
USRT Cheap, plain-vanilla ownership of U.S. landlords: roughly 130 equity REITs for eight basis points, running since 2007. One of the least expensive doors into the real estate aisle.
Stated mandate
RDOG RDOG seeks to replicate the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index before fees and expenses. It selects high-yielding US REITs across nine equally weighted REIT segments.
USRT The fund seeks to track an index composed of U.S. real estate equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RDOG vs USRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RDOG vs USRT Cost
Overpaying RDOG vs USRT
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RDOG 0.35%
$7,126
USRT 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RDOG | USRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $147 | $487 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $575 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,689 | $5,437 |
- 0.35%RDOG
- 0.08%USRT, cheaper
- Middle half of US Real Estate funds
- Median 0.35%
USRT 2nd cheapest of 21 funds
RDOG 11th cheapest of 21 funds
RDOG vs USRT Dividends
- RDOG 6.41%, better
- USRT 2.75%
- RDOG $2.46
- USRT $1.75
- RDOG $0.58
- USRT $0.47
- RDOG Sep 17, 2026
- USRT Sep 15, 2026
- RDOG Sep 22, 2026
- USRT Sep 18, 2026
- RDOG Quarterly
- USRT Quarterly
Distribution history
RDOG vs USRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RDOG
- USRT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RDOG 17.4%USRT 16.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RDOG 0.54USRT 0.70, better
- Worst fall
- RDOG −35.4%USRT −31.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RDOG 1.00USRT 0.96
RDOG and USRT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




