RWM ranks 4th and REK 8th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
REK vs RWM
95.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 1401.4×the volume
21.4K30M
REK +4.8pt
−6.5%−11.3%
REK vs RWM Performance
+9.1%−15.9%
- REK 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- REK $10M
- RWM $163M
- REK −5.1%, better
- RWM −10.1%
- REK 2.89%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- REK 2
- RWM 3
- REK 21.4K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- REK $15.98
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | REK | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A81Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | B62 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | B63Higher |
| Durability | C54 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. REK and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
REKB
RWMB
In short
REK The calm way to lean against real estate: REK aims to deliver -1x the daily move of the S&P Real Estate Select Sector Index, with no extra leverage stacked on top. Fee is 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
REK The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the daily performance of the S&P Real Estate Select Sector Index.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
REK vs RWM Holdings
How REK and RWM differ
95.3%
Shared holdings make up 100% of REK and 95.3% of RWM.
Level by level
- Holdings95.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in REKMore in RWM | REK | RWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in REKMore in RWM | REK | RWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- REK100.0%
- RWM100.0%
- REK1
- RWM2
Asset class
- REK
- Equity
- RWM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in REK0
- In both1
- Only in RWM1
Only in REK
0 securities, 0.0% of REK by weight
Only in RWM
1 security, 4.7% of RWM by weight
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in REKMore in RWM | REK | RWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf | REK +2.03 points | 83.72% | 81.69% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
REK vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
REK 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | REK | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%REK
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
REK 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
REK vs RWM Dividends
- REK 2.89%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- REK $0.46
- RWM $0.48
- REK $0.11
- RWM $0.09
- REK Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- REK Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- REK Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
REK vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- REK
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- REK 16.5%, betterRWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- REK −0.62, betterRWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- REK −26.9%, betterRWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- REK −0.85RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.