Skip to content

RFG vs SCHK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFGCNYSE Arca

Schwab 1000 Index ETF

SCHKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHK −0.32pt a year

RFG0.35%SCHK0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHK 167.1×the volume

RFG7.86KSCHK1.31M

5Y return · a year

SCHK +7.3pt

RFG+4.0%SCHK+11.3%

RFG vs SCHK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.7%RFG+70.5%SCHK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. RFG +21.7%. SCHK +70.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RFG 0.35%
SCHK 0.03%, better
Fund size
RFG $315M
SCHK $5.69B
1Y total return
RFG +10.2%
SCHK +11.8%, better
Yield (12M)
RFG 0.11%
SCHK 1.05%, better
Holdings
RFG 103
SCHK 999
Avg volume (30D)
RFG 7.86K sh
SCHK 1.31M sh, better
NAV per share
RFG $56.75
SCHK $36.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RFG: Cost 41, Risk 19, Mission 77, Tradability 55, Holdings 74, Durability 65. SCHK: Cost 98, Risk 66, Mission 100, Tradability 90, Holdings 57, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for RFG, SCHK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRFGSCHK
Cost30% weightC41A98Higher
Mission25% weightA77A100Higher
Risk15% weightF19B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB55A90Higher
Holdings10% weightA74HigherB57
Durability5% weightB65B68Higher

Rank among Other Major Indexes funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RFG and SCHK are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Major Indexes⁠

Category · 42 funds
See all 42 ›

SCHK ranks 2nd and RFG 21st of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYVState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2ASCHKSchwab 1000 Index ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3APBUSInvesco MSCI USA ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 20BSPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 21CRFGInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 22CBBEMJPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RFGCInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF

SCHKASchwab 1000 Index ETF

In short

RFG Most mid-cap growth funds cast a wide net. RFG runs the pure version: about 100 names from the S&P MidCap 400 that screen strongest on growth, tracked as an index, for 0.35% a year.

SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.

Stated mandate

RFG The fund seeks to track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index before fees and expenses and generally invests in the securities comprising that index.

SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • RFG Cheaper than the typical index wrapper in its peer group: 0.35% a year versus a 0.45% cohort median.
  • The mandate leaves no wiggle room: track the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index and hold the securities in it. Rules pick the portfolio, not a manager's mood.
  • Concentrated by design, roughly 100 stocks rather than the whole mid-cap 400, so the growth tilt actually shows up in the portfolio.
  • Trading since 2006, a long live record for a single-factor slice, and it lands in the upper half of its index-wrapper cohort.
  • SCHK 0.03% a year, the lowest fee among the top-scoring funds in its index-wrapper group and a small fraction of what the typical fund there charges.
  • About 1,000 stocks covering roughly 90% or more of US stock market value: the S&P 500 names plus a layer of mid caps most large-blend funds skip.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • Tracks its stated index tightly and stands among the strongest implementations in its peer group of plain index wrappers.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively and pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • RFG Thinly traded for an index fund, so spreads and order handling matter more here than with the cohort's giants.
  • It sits at the more volatile end of its peer group: a concentrated growth screen with no value names to steady it.
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, but income is a byproduct of a growth screen, not the objective.
  • SCHK Weighted by market value, so the biggest US companies drive the bulk of results. Those extra 500 names carry less weight than the headcount suggests.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • All-US, all-equity by mandate: no bonds, no foreign stocks, and it rides the full swings of the US market.
  • The benchmark is Schwab's own proprietary index, so there is no rival fund on the identical yardstick for a side-by-side comparison.

Full RFG profile⁠

Full SCHK profile⁠

RFG vs SCHK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RFG vs SCHK Cost

Overpaying RFG vs SCHK

$6,488

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RFG 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SCHK 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RFG 0.35%
  • SCHK 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RFG $7,126SCHK $638

Year by year

YearRFGSCHKOverpaying
10$634$55$579
20$2,454$216$2,238
30$7,126$638$6,488

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%RFG
  • 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
  • Median 0.29%

SCHK cheapest of 42 funds

RFG 24th cheapest of 42 funds

RFG vs SCHK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RFG 0.11%
SCHK 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
RFG $0.06
SCHK $0.38
Last payment
RFG $0.02
SCHK $0.10
Ex-dividend
RFG Sep 21, 2026
SCHK Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
RFG Sep 25, 2026
SCHK Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
RFG Quarterly
SCHK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RFGQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll RFG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.03; Sep 15, 2017 $0.04; Dec 15, 2017 $0.05; Mar 16, 2018 $0.03; Jun 15, 2018 $0.03; Sep 24, 2018 $0.11; Dec 24, 2018 $0.04; Mar 18, 2019 $0.06; Jun 24, 2019 $0.06; Sep 23, 2019 $0.06; Dec 23, 2019 $0.03; Mar 23, 2020 $0.05; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Sep 21, 2020 $0.02; Dec 21, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2021 $0.02; Mar 21, 2022 $0.04; Jun 21, 2022 $0.07; Sep 19, 2022 $0.08; Dec 19, 2022 $0.09; Mar 20, 2023 $0.11; Jun 20, 2023 $0.09; Sep 18, 2023 $0.08; Dec 18, 2023 $0.12; Mar 18, 2024 $0.07; Jun 24, 2024 $0.05; Sep 23, 2024 $0.04; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 24, 2025 $0.03; Jun 23, 2025 $0.12; Sep 22, 2025 $0.04; Dec 22, 2025 $0.03; Mar 23, 2026 $0.01; Jun 22, 2026 $0.0076; Sep 21, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
SCHKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SCHK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.04; Dec 27, 2017 $0.0025; Mar 16, 2018 $0.04; Jun 26, 2018 $0.06; Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 12, 2018 $0.06; Mar 20, 2019 $0.06; Jun 26, 2019 $0.06; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 12, 2019 $0.09; Mar 25, 2020 $0.07; Jun 24, 2020 $0.06; Sep 23, 2020 $0.09; Dec 10, 2020 $0.07; Mar 24, 2021 $0.06; Jun 23, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.07; Dec 8, 2021 $0.08; Dec 30, 2021 $0.004; Mar 23, 2022 $0.06; Jun 22, 2022 $0.07; Sep 21, 2022 $0.07; Dec 7, 2022 $0.09; Mar 22, 2023 $0.07; Jun 21, 2023 $0.08; Sep 20, 2023 $0.08; Dec 6, 2023 $0.09; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0035; Mar 20, 2024 $0.08; Jun 26, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 11, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.08; Jun 25, 2025 $0.09; Sep 24, 2025 $0.09; Dec 10, 2025 $0.10; Mar 25, 2026 $0.09; Jun 24, 2026 $0.09; Sep 23, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

RFG vs SCHK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RFG
  • SCHK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RFG −35.2% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RFG 18.4%SCHK 12.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RFG 0.63SCHK 1.39, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RFG −35.2%SCHK −25.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RFG 1.14SCHK 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • RFGCvsSPYVA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsSPYVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RFGCvsPBUSA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsPBUSA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RFGCvsVOOVA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsVOOVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.