SCHK ranks 2nd and RFG 21st of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
RFG vs SCHK
SCHK −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCHK 167.1×the volume
7.86K1.31M
SCHK +7.3pt
+4.0%+11.3%
RFG vs SCHK Performance
+21.7%+70.5%
- RFG 0.35%
- SCHK 0.03%, better
- RFG $315M
- SCHK $5.69B
- RFG +10.2%
- SCHK +11.8%, better
- RFG 0.11%
- SCHK 1.05%, better
- RFG 103
- SCHK 999
- RFG 7.86K sh
- SCHK 1.31M sh, better
- RFG $56.75
- SCHK $36.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RFG | SCHK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A77 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F19 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B57 |
| Durability | B65 | B68Higher |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. RFG and SCHK are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RFGC
SCHKA
In short
RFG Most mid-cap growth funds cast a wide net. RFG runs the pure version: about 100 names from the S&P MidCap 400 that screen strongest on growth, tracked as an index, for 0.35% a year.
SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.
Stated mandate
RFG The fund seeks to track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index before fees and expenses and generally invests in the securities comprising that index.
SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RFG vs SCHK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RFG vs SCHK Cost
Overpaying RFG vs SCHK
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RFG 0.35%
$7,126
SCHK 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RFG | SCHK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%RFG
- 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SCHK cheapest of 42 funds
RFG 24th cheapest of 42 funds
RFG vs SCHK Dividends
- RFG 0.11%
- SCHK 1.05%, better
- RFG $0.06
- SCHK $0.38
- RFG $0.02
- SCHK $0.10
- RFG Sep 21, 2026
- SCHK Sep 23, 2026
- RFG Sep 25, 2026
- SCHK Sep 28, 2026
- RFG Quarterly
- SCHK Quarterly
Distribution history
RFG vs SCHK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RFG
- SCHK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RFG 18.4%SCHK 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RFG 0.63SCHK 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- RFG −35.2%SCHK −25.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RFG 1.14SCHK 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.