SPYV ranks 1st and RFG 21st of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
RFG vs SPYV
SPYV −0.31pt a year
0.35%0.04%
SPYV 267.6×the volume
7.86K2.1M
SPYV +2.7pt
+9.6%+12.3%
RFG vs SPYV Performance
+21.7%+74.1%
- RFG 0.35%
- SPYV 0.04%, better
- RFG $315M
- SPYV $39.2B
- RFG +10.2%
- SPYV +16.6%, better
- RFG 0.11%
- SPYV 1.65%, better
- RFG 103
- SPYV 437
- RFG 7.86K sh
- SPYV 2.1M sh, better
- RFG $56.75
- SPYV $64.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RFG | SPYV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A77 | A86Higher |
| Risk | F19 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | A71 |
| Durability | B65 | A86Higher |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. RFG and SPYV are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RFGC
SPYVA
In short
RFG Most mid-cap growth funds cast a wide net. RFG runs the pure version: about 100 names from the S&P MidCap 400 that screen strongest on growth, tracked as an index, for 0.35% a year.
SPYV The value side of the S&P 500, tracked since 2000 for four basis points. It does one thing: hold the index names that screen cheap, and charge close to nothing for the privilege.
Stated mandate
RFG The fund seeks to track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index before fees and expenses and generally invests in the securities comprising that index.
SPYV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RFG vs SPYV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RFG vs SPYV Cost
Overpaying RFG vs SPYV
$6,277
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RFG 0.35%
$7,126
SPYV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RFG | SPYV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $73 | $561 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $288 | $2,166 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $849 | $6,277 |
- 0.35%RFG
- 0.04%SPYV, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SPYV 2nd cheapest of 42 funds
RFG 24th cheapest of 42 funds
RFG vs SPYV Dividends
- RFG 0.11%
- SPYV 1.65%, better
- RFG $0.06
- SPYV $1.06
- RFG $0.02
- SPYV $0.27
- RFG Sep 21, 2026
- SPYV Sep 21, 2026
- RFG Sep 25, 2026
- SPYV Sep 23, 2026
- RFG Quarterly
- SPYV Quarterly
Distribution history
RFG vs SPYV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RFG
- SPYV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RFG 18.4%SPYV 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RFG 0.63SPYV 1.17, better
- Worst fall
- RFG −35.2%SPYV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RFG 1.14SPYV 0.83
RFG and SPYV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

