SCHK ranks 2nd and RFV 24th of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
RFV vs SCHK
SCHK −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCHK 211.6×the volume
6.35K1.34M
SCHK +0.5pt
+9.6%+10.1%
RFV vs SCHK Performance
+58.2%+61.9%
- RFV 0.35%
- SCHK 0.03%, better
- RFV $345M
- SCHK $5.76B
- RFV +16.1%, better
- SCHK +9.2%
- RFV 1.67%, better
- SCHK 1.09%
- RFV 97
- SCHK 998
- RFV 6.35K sh
- SCHK 1.34M sh, better
- RFV $149.25
- SCHK $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RFV | SCHK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A98Higher |
| Mission | C54 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D38 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | B60Higher |
| Durability | B67 | B68Higher |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. RFV and SCHK are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RFVC
SCHKA
In short
RFV Mid-cap value with no hedging: RFV holds only the deepest-value slice of the S&P MidCap 400, roughly 100 names, and skips everything else. It has run that same screen since 2006 at a fee below the typical index fund in its class.
SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.
Stated mandate
RFV The Fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value Index.
SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RFV vs SCHK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RFV vs SCHK Cost
Overpaying RFV vs SCHK
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RFV 0.35%
$7,126
SCHK 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RFV | SCHK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%RFV
- 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SCHK cheapest of 42 funds
RFV 24th cheapest of 42 funds
RFV vs SCHK Dividends
- RFV 1.67%, better
- SCHK 1.09%
- RFV $2.39
- SCHK $0.38
- RFV $0.57
- SCHK $0.10
- RFV Sep 21, 2026
- SCHK Sep 23, 2026
- RFV Sep 25, 2026
- SCHK Sep 28, 2026
- RFV Quarterly
- SCHK Quarterly
Distribution history
RFV vs SCHK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RFV
- SCHK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RFV 18.2%SCHK 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RFV 0.79SCHK 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- RFV −24.7%, betterSCHK −25.4%
- Market sensitivity
- RFV 1.08SCHK 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.