Skip to content

RFV vs SCHK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFVCNYSE Arca

Schwab 1000 Index ETF

SCHKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHK −0.32pt a year

RFV0.35%SCHK0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHK 211.6×the volume

RFV6.35KSCHK1.34M

5Y return · a year

SCHK +0.5pt

RFV+9.6%SCHK+10.1%

RFV vs SCHK Performance

Nov 5, 2021 – Nov 5, 2026

+58.2%RFV+61.9%SCHK

Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 5, 2026. RFV +58.2%. SCHK +61.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RFV 0.35%
SCHK 0.03%, better
Fund size
RFV $345M
SCHK $5.76B
1Y total return
RFV +16.1%, better
SCHK +9.2%
Yield (12M)
RFV 1.67%, better
SCHK 1.09%
Holdings
RFV 97
SCHK 998
Avg volume (30D)
RFV 6.35K sh
SCHK 1.34M sh, better
NAV per share
RFV $149.25
SCHK $36.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RFV: Cost 41, Risk 38, Mission 54, Tradability 52, Holdings 57, Durability 67. SCHK: Cost 98, Risk 65, Mission 100, Tradability 90, Holdings 60, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for RFV, SCHK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRFVSCHK
Cost30% weightC41A98Higher
Mission25% weightC54A100Higher
Risk15% weightD38B65Higher
Tradability15% weightC52A90Higher
Holdings10% weightB57B60Higher
Durability5% weightB67B68Higher

Rank among Other Major Indexes funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RFV and SCHK are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Major Indexes⁠

Category · 42 funds
See all 42 ›

SCHK ranks 2nd and RFV 24th of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYVState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2ASCHKSchwab 1000 Index ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3APBUSInvesco MSCI USA ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 24CNYSXGlobal X NYSE 100 ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 24CRFVInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 24CTMFXMotley Fool Next Index ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RFVCInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF

SCHKASchwab 1000 Index ETF

In short

RFV Mid-cap value with no hedging: RFV holds only the deepest-value slice of the S&P MidCap 400, roughly 100 names, and skips everything else. It has run that same screen since 2006 at a fee below the typical index fund in its class.

SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.

Stated mandate

RFV The Fund seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value Index.

SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • RFV The screen is the whole point. About 100 names survive out of the S&P MidCap 400, so the value tilt actually shows up in the portfolio instead of getting diluted.
  • 0.35% a year, under the median for its index-fund peer group. A concentrated factor screen without a boutique price tag.
  • Live since 2006 under Invesco, so the strategy has a long public record rather than a backtest, and it distributes quarterly.
  • SCHK 0.03% a year, the lowest fee among the top-scoring funds in its index-wrapper group and a small fraction of what the typical fund there charges.
  • About 1,000 stocks covering roughly 90% or more of US stock market value: the S&P 500 names plus a layer of mid caps most large-blend funds skip.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • Tracks its stated index tightly and stands among the strongest implementations in its peer group of plain index wrappers.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively and pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • RFV Thinly traded. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than on mainstream index funds, which makes the mechanics of the trade itself worth attention.
  • Concentration cuts both ways: roughly 100 hard-screened stocks move around more than the full 400, and value can sit out of favor for long stretches.
  • Cheap for a factor fund, not cheap outright. Plain vanilla value index peers such as SPYV and VOOV charge a fraction as much for broader, blunter exposure.
  • SCHK Weighted by market value, so the biggest US companies drive the bulk of results. Those extra 500 names carry less weight than the headcount suggests.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • All-US, all-equity by mandate: no bonds, no foreign stocks, and it rides the full swings of the US market.
  • The benchmark is Schwab's own proprietary index, so there is no rival fund on the identical yardstick for a side-by-side comparison.

Full RFV profile⁠

Full SCHK profile⁠

RFV vs SCHK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RFV vs SCHK Cost

Overpaying RFV vs SCHK

$6,488

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RFV 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SCHK 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RFV 0.35%
  • SCHK 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RFV $7,126SCHK $638

Year by year

YearRFVSCHKOverpaying
10$634$55$579
20$2,454$216$2,238
30$7,126$638$6,488

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%RFV
  • 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
  • Median 0.29%

SCHK cheapest of 42 funds

RFV 24th cheapest of 42 funds

RFV vs SCHK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
RFV 1.67%, better
SCHK 1.09%
Payout (12M)
RFV $2.39
SCHK $0.38
Last payment
RFV $0.57
SCHK $0.10
Ex-dividend
RFV Sep 21, 2026
SCHK Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
RFV Sep 25, 2026
SCHK Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
RFV Quarterly
SCHK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RFVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RFV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.20; Jun 16, 2017 $0.29; Sep 15, 2017 $0.23; Dec 15, 2017 $0.23; Mar 16, 2018 $0.20; Jun 15, 2018 $0.20; Sep 24, 2018 $0.21; Dec 24, 2018 $0.18; Mar 18, 2019 $0.23; Jun 24, 2019 $0.27; Sep 23, 2019 $0.29; Dec 23, 2019 $0.39; Mar 23, 2020 $0.42; Jun 22, 2020 $0.34; Sep 21, 2020 $0.21; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.32; Jun 21, 2021 $0.30; Sep 20, 2021 $0.40; Dec 20, 2021 $0.53; Mar 21, 2022 $0.42; Jun 21, 2022 $0.56; Sep 19, 2022 $0.49; Dec 19, 2022 $0.39; Mar 20, 2023 $0.40; Jun 20, 2023 $0.40; Sep 18, 2023 $0.36; Dec 18, 2023 $0.33; Mar 18, 2024 $0.36; Jun 24, 2024 $0.40; Sep 23, 2024 $0.41; Dec 23, 2024 $0.42; Mar 24, 2025 $0.66; Jun 23, 2025 $0.77; Sep 22, 2025 $0.60; Dec 22, 2025 $0.62; Mar 23, 2026 $0.66; Jun 22, 2026 $0.54; Sep 21, 2026 $0.57. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SCHKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SCHK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.04; Dec 27, 2017 $0.0025; Mar 16, 2018 $0.04; Jun 26, 2018 $0.06; Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 12, 2018 $0.06; Mar 20, 2019 $0.06; Jun 26, 2019 $0.06; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 12, 2019 $0.09; Mar 25, 2020 $0.07; Jun 24, 2020 $0.06; Sep 23, 2020 $0.09; Dec 10, 2020 $0.07; Mar 24, 2021 $0.06; Jun 23, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.07; Dec 8, 2021 $0.08; Dec 30, 2021 $0.004; Mar 23, 2022 $0.06; Jun 22, 2022 $0.07; Sep 21, 2022 $0.07; Dec 7, 2022 $0.09; Mar 22, 2023 $0.07; Jun 21, 2023 $0.08; Sep 20, 2023 $0.08; Dec 6, 2023 $0.09; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0035; Mar 20, 2024 $0.08; Jun 26, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 11, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.08; Jun 25, 2025 $0.09; Sep 24, 2025 $0.09; Dec 10, 2025 $0.10; Mar 25, 2026 $0.09; Jun 24, 2026 $0.09; Sep 23, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

RFV vs SCHK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RFV
  • SCHK
Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 5, 2026. Worst fall: RFV −24.7% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RFV 18.2%SCHK 12.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RFV 0.79SCHK 1.39, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RFV −24.7%, betterSCHK −25.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RFV 1.08SCHK 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • RFVCvsSPYVA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsSPYVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RFVCvsPBUSA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsPBUSA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RFVCvsVOOVA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsVOOVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.