TSDD ranks 2nd and RGTZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
RGTZ vs TSDD
TSDD −0.85pt a year
1.83%0.98%
TSDD 16.2×the volume
680K11M
RGTZ vs TSDD Performance
−54.0%−24.7%
- RGTZ 1.83%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- RGTZ $14M
- TSDD $31M
- RGTZ −54.0%
- TSDD −24.7%, better
- RGTZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- RGTZ 3
- TSDD 1
- RGTZ 680K sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- RGTZ $25.61
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RGTZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A98Higher |
| Risk | C43 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C53 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. RGTZ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RGTZC
TSDDA
In short
RGTZ The first ETF built to short Rigetti two-for-one. RGTZ aims for -200% of the quantum computing stock's move each trading day, with the clock reset at every close, and charges 1.83%.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
RGTZ The fund seeks daily inverse results of negative two times the daily percentage change in Rigetti Computing, Inc.’s share price. It is intended for short-term tactical use and does not target results beyond one trading day.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RGTZ vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RGTZ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying RGTZ vs TSDD
$12,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RGTZ 1.83%
$30,754
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RGTZ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,117 | $1,729 | $1,388 |
| 20 | $11,291 | $6,504 | $4,787 |
| 30 | $30,754 | $18,362 | $12,392 |
- 1.83%RGTZ
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
RGTZ 40th cheapest of 43 funds
RGTZ vs TSDD Dividends
- RGTZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- RGTZ None
- TSDD $0.65
- RGTZ
- TSDD $0.65
- RGTZ
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- RGTZ
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- RGTZ
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
RGTZ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RGTZ 180.0%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- RGTZ 0.49TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- RGTZ −92.9%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- RGTZ −7.29TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.83% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.83% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.83% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.