Skip to content

RHRX vs TACU

Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF

RHRXDNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

TACUANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TACU −1.38pt a year

RHRX1.38%TACU0.00%

Avg volume · 30D

RHRX 4.5×the volume

RHRX18.8KTACU4.15K

RHRX vs TACU Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.0%RHRX+11.2%TACU

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. RHRX +17.0%. TACU +11.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RHRX 1.38%
TACU 0.00%, better
Fund size
RHRX $58M
TACU $17M
1Y total return
RHRX +15.9%
TACU No data
Holdings
RHRX 5
TACU 411
Avg volume (30D)
RHRX 18.8K sh, better
TACU 4.15K sh
NAV per share
RHRX $21.56
TACU $27.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RHRX: Cost 7, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 26, Durability 64. TACU: Cost 99, Risk 69, Mission 81, Tradability 49, Holdings 83, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for RHRX, TACU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRHRXTACU
Cost30% weightF7A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightB55B69Higher
Tradability15% weightD32C49Higher
Holdings10% weightD26A83Higher
Durability5% weightB64HigherC43

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RHRX and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

TACU ranks 9th and RHRX 110th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 8AAPUEActivePassive U.S. Equity ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 9ATACUT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 10APQUSPictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 108DMSTBLHA Market State Tactical Beta ETFScore 30
  5. Rank 110DRHRXAdaptive Tactical Rotation ETFScore 27
  6. Rank 111DGGMGGM Macro Alignment ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RHRXDAdaptive Tactical Rotation ETF

TACUAT. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF

In short

RHRX A fund of ETFs with a market-timing switch: an S&P 500 core that can be hedged with options, plus permission to rotate into Treasury bond ETFs, cash, or inverse ETFs when its trend model turns negative.

TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

RHRX The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.

Why people hold it

  • RHRX Unusually flexible mandate for an equity fund: the prospectus allows hedging S&P 500 positions with puts and calls and moving into treasury bond ETFs, cash, or inverse ETFs in downtrends.sec.gov
  • The signal set is disclosed rather than vague: price momentum, volatility, and comparative indicators versus certain indices drive when the portfolio turns defensive.sec.gov
  • Exposure arrives through unaffiliated ETFs whose holdings are generally S&P 500 common stocks, so the underlying is familiar large-cap equity, not exotic single names.sec.gov
  • Running since 2021 inside a 1940 Act ETF wrapper, with daily holdings disclosure and the same rules that govern plain index funds.
  • TACU Fee fully waived: 0.14% gross, zero net through January 30, 2027. That sits below every top-scoring peer in the category, including DFAU at 0.12% with no waiver.troweprice.com
  • Quant models feed bottom-up stock picking with tilts to profitability, quality and value, chasing excess return over the Russell 1000 while holding tracking error tight.troweprice.com
  • Several hundred large-cap names, so no single position runs the show. One of the stronger profiles in a crowded active U.S. equity field.troweprice.com

Worth knowing

  • RHRX Costs 1.38% a year, more than double the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and many times cheap core rivals like DFAU (0.12%) or AVLC (0.15%).
  • Small and thinly traded, which typically means wider bid/ask spreads and more price impact on larger orders than with headline-size funds.
  • Defensive mode can mean heavy cash or leveraged and inverse ETFs, which reset daily; a trend model that turns early or late shows up directly in results.sec.gov
  • TACU Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and the risk read rests on limited history.
  • Still a small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider spreads than the category's giants.
  • Distributions are annual at most, with no declared income target. This is a growth mandate, not a cash-flow one.

Full RHRX profile⁠

Full TACU profile⁠

RHRX vs TACU Holdings

How RHRX and TACU differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of RHRX and 0.0% of TACU.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile98.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TACU.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in RHRX and TACU, widest gap first
CountryMore in RHRXMore in TACU
United StatesTACU +0.1 points
TaiwanRHRX +0.5 points
SwitzerlandTACU +0.4 points
CanadaTACU +0.4 points
South KoreaRHRX +0.4 points
United KingdomTACU +0.2 points
NetherlandsRHRX +0.2 points
IsraelRHRX +0.1 points
Other countries (6)TACU +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • RHRX100.0%
  • TACU34.9%

Securities held

  • RHRX5
  • TACU408

Asset class

RHRX
Equity
TACU
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in RHRX5
  • In both0
  • Only in TACU408

Only in RHRX

5 securities, 100% of RHRX by weight

  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust47.67%
  • State Stret Enrgy Slect Sec Spdr Etf18.68%
  • Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund17.12%

Only in TACU

408 securities, 99.8% of TACU by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0017.26%
  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000016.90%
  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006255.63%

Weight gaps

RHRX and TACU share no securities.

All 4 RHRX holdings⁠All TACU holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RHRX vs TACU Cost

Overpaying RHRX vs TACU

$24,554

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RHRX 1.38%

    $24,554

  • TACU 0.00%

    $0

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RHRX 1.38%
  • TACU 0.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530RHRX $24,554TACU $0

Year by year

YearRHRXTACUOverpaying
10$2,395$0$2,395
20$8,848$0$8,848
30$24,554$0$24,554

Expense ratio

  • 1.38%RHRX
  • 0.00%TACU, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

TACU cheapest of 121 funds

RHRX 112th cheapest of 121 funds

RHRX vs TACU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
RHRX None
TACU None

Distribution history

RHRXAll RHRX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TACUAll TACU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RHRX vs TACU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RHRX 12.8%TACU No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RHRX 1.26TACU No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RHRX −25.3%since Nov 2021TACU No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RHRX 1.00TACU 0.96

RHRX and TACU in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RHRXDvsAVLCA

    Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsAVLCA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHRXDvsDFAUA

    Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsDFAUA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHRXDvsDFACA

    Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TACUAvsDFACA

    T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.00% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.