VTEB ranks 1st and RMCA 55th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
RMCA vs VTEB
VTEB −0.52pt a year
0.55%0.03%
VTEB 2974.1×the volume
5.95K17.7M
RMCA vs VTEB Performance
+1.4%+1.3%
- RMCA 0.55%
- VTEB 0.03%, better
- RMCA $19M
- VTEB $49.6B
- RMCA +1.4%, better
- VTEB +1.3%
- RMCA 4.38%, better
- VTEB 3.45%
- RMCA 89
- VTEB 11156
- RMCA 5.95K sh
- VTEB 17.7M sh, better
- RMCA $23.62
- VTEB $49.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RMCA | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A97 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D32 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A86Higher |
| Durability | F14 | A95Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. RMCA and VTEB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RMCAC
VTEBA
In short
RMCA Most muni ETFs buy the whole country. RMCA buys California, actively, going after income exempt from both federal and California state tax. A boutique single-state take from the Rockefeller name, launched in 2024.
VTEB Vanguard's national muni index fund, running since 2015 at three basis points, a tenth of what the typical muni ETF charges. Its benchmark screens for investment-grade bonds whose income is exempt from federal tax and the AMT.
Stated mandate
RMCA The Fund seeks tax-exempt income at both the U.S. federal and California state levels through investments in California municipal bonds.
VTEB VTEB seeks to track an index measuring the investment-grade segment of the U.S. municipal bond market. It uses passive sampling to approximate the index and generally invests in federally tax-exempt municipal securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RMCA vs VTEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RMCA vs VTEB Cost
Overpaying RMCA vs VTEB
$10,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RMCA 0.55%
$10,904
VTEB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RMCA | VTEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $55 | $933 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $216 | $3,574 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $638 | $10,266 |
- 0.55%RMCA
- 0.03%VTEB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VTEB cheapest of 63 funds
RMCA 58th cheapest of 63 funds
RMCA vs VTEB Dividends
- RMCA 4.38%, better
- VTEB 3.45%
- RMCA $1.04
- VTEB $1.70
- RMCA $0.09
- VTEB $0.14
- RMCA Oct 29, 2026
- VTEB Nov 2, 2026
- RMCA Oct 30, 2026
- VTEB Nov 4, 2026
- RMCA Monthly
- VTEB Monthly
Distribution history
RMCA vs VTEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RMCA 6.1%VTEB 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- RMCA −0.49VTEB −0.004
- Worst fall
- RMCA −7.7%VTEB −12.3%
- Market sensitivity
- RMCA 0.17VTEB 0.95
RMCA and VTEB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





