MUB ranks 3rd and RMCA 55th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs RMCA
MUB −0.50pt a year
0.05%0.55%
MUB 1621.5×the volume
9.65M5.95K
MUB vs RMCA Performance
+1.1%+1.4%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- RMCA 0.55%
- MUB $55B
- RMCA $19M
- MUB +1.1%
- RMCA +1.4%, better
- MUB 3.26%
- RMCA 4.38%, better
- MUB 7990
- RMCA 89
- MUB 9.65M sh, better
- RMCA 5.95K sh
- MUB $104.86
- RMCA $23.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | RMCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A97 |
| Risk | B56Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A93Higher | F14 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and RMCA are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
RMCAC
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
RMCA Most muni ETFs buy the whole country. RMCA buys California, actively, going after income exempt from both federal and California state tax. A boutique single-state take from the Rockefeller name, launched in 2024.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
RMCA The Fund seeks tax-exempt income at both the U.S. federal and California state levels through investments in California municipal bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs RMCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs RMCA Cost
Overpaying RMCA vs MUB
$9,844
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
RMCA 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | RMCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $988 | $896 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,790 | $3,430 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $10,904 | $9,844 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.55%RMCA
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
RMCA 58th cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs RMCA Dividends
- MUB 3.26%
- RMCA 4.38%, better
- MUB $3.42
- RMCA $1.04
- MUB $0.28
- RMCA $0.09
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- RMCA Oct 29, 2026
- MUB Nov 5, 2026
- RMCA Oct 30, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- RMCA Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs RMCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%RMCA 6.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03RMCA −0.49
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%RMCA −7.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90RMCA 0.17
MUB and RMCA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





