Skip to content

RPV vs VTV

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPVBNYSE Arca

Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

VTVANYSE Arca

Overlap

17.4%by weight

Expense ratio

VTV −0.32pt a year

RPV0.35%VTV0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

VTV 15.8×the volume

RPV181KVTV2.85M

10Y return · a year

VTV +1.6pt

RPV+11.1%VTV+12.7%

RPV vs VTV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+69.6%RPV+76.4%VTV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. RPV +69.6%. VTV +76.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RPV 0.35%
VTV 0.03%, better
Fund size
RPV $1.81B
VTV $184B
1Y total return
RPV +25.5%, better
VTV +24.6%
Yield (12M)
RPV 2.07%, better
VTV 1.83%
Holdings
RPV 121
VTV 311
Avg volume (30D)
RPV 181K sh
VTV 2.85M sh, better
NAV per share
RPV $120.24
VTV $223.03
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RPV: Cost 28, Risk 65, Mission 79, Tradability 78, Holdings 50, Durability 70. VTV: Cost 96, Risk 83, Mission 89, Tradability 66, Holdings 50, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for RPV, VTV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRPVVTV
Cost30% weightD28A96Higher
Mission25% weightA79A89Higher
Risk15% weightB65A83Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherB66
Holdings10% weightC50C50
Durability5% weightA70A86Higher

Rank among US Value Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RPV and VTV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Value Index⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

VTV ranks 2nd and RPV 21st of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AVTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETFScore 82
  3. Rank 3AIUSViShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 18BSTXVStrive 1000 Value ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 21BRPVInvesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 22BRAUSRACWI US ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RPVBInvesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

VTVAVanguard Morningstar Value ETF

In short

RPV Most value funds hold anything that isn't growth. RPV takes only the deepest-value slice of the S&P 500, about 120 names, weighted by how cheap they screen rather than how big they are.

VTV Value investing for three cents on every hundred dollars a year. Since 2004, VTV has run a passive, fully invested portfolio of roughly 300 large US companies that screen cheap, at a fee near the industry floor.

Stated mandate

RPV The fund is based on the S&P 500 Pure Value Index and invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising that index.

VTV The fund seeks to track a large-capitalization U.S. value-stock benchmark through passive indexing and substantial replication of that index.

Why people hold it

  • RPV Stocks are sorted on value and growth metrics both, so blend names wash out and only the strongest value scores reach the index.spglobal.com
  • Weights follow style attractiveness, not market cap, so the biggest company in the basket isn't automatically the biggest position.spglobal.com
  • Running since 2006, with at least 90% of assets held in its index securities. What's on the tin is what sits in the portfolio.
  • VTV 0.03% a year, about a sixth of the 0.18% median for US value funds. Cost is the part of the outcome the fund actually controls.
  • Same recipe, very different sticker: PRXV tracks the same declared value index and charges 0.36%, twelve times VTV's fee.
  • Passively managed, full replication, fully invested. No manager hunches, no cash sitting idle, and the fund has tracked its benchmark closely.vanguard.com
  • One of the largest and most actively traded funds in the US value aisle, the kind of scale that keeps bid-ask spreads thin for ordinary orders.

Worth knowing

  • RPV At 0.35% it runs well above the category median of 0.18%, and broad value peers like VTV (0.03%) and IUSV (0.04%) charge a sliver of that.
  • About 120 names, with sector weights falling out of the screen rather than being targeted. The fund can lean hard on whatever corner of the market screens cheapest.spglobal.com
  • Deep value means owning the companies the market has marked down, so the ride can look nothing like a cap-weighted value fund's.spglobal.com
  • VTV Large caps only, about 300 of them. Cheap mid- and small-cap stocks live in separate funds (VOE, VTWV), so this is one slice of value, not the whole market.
  • It is a value screen by design, so the priciest fast growers are largely filtered out. In growth-led stretches it can move very differently from a total-market fund.
  • Income arrives quarterly, in four instalments rather than a monthly drip.

Full RPV profile⁠

Full VTV profile⁠

RPV vs VTV Holdings

How RPV and VTV differ

Overlap by weight

17.4%

Shared holdings make up 70.8% of RPV and 22.9% of VTV.

Level by level

  • Holdings81 in both17.4%
  • Sector11 Sectors77.2%
  • Countryby domicile97.3%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in RPV and VTV, widest gap first
SectorMore in RPVMore in VTVGap
TechnologyVTV +10.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryRPV +7.0 points
IndustrialsVTV +6.4 points
MaterialsRPV +4.8 points
FinancialsVTV +4.0 points
Consumer StaplesRPV +3.5 points
EnergyRPV +3.4 points
Health CareRPV +2.6 points
CommunicationRPV +1.6 points
Real EstateVTV +1.1 points
UtilitiesVTV +0.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in RPV and VTV, widest gap first
CountryMore in RPVMore in VTVGap
United StatesVTV +2.7 points
IrelandRPV +1.5 points
United KingdomRPV +0.7 points
SwitzerlandRPV +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • RPV20.5%
  • VTV23.6%

Securities held

  • RPV117
  • VTV309

Asset class

RPV
Stocks
VTV
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in RPV36
  • In both81
  • Only in VTV228

Only in RPV

36 securities, 29.1% of RPV by weight

  • Bunge Global SA1.96%
  • Everest Group Ltd1.68%
  • Elevance Health Inc1.67%

Only in VTV

228 securities, 77.2% of VTV by weight

  • Micron Technology Inc4.56%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co3.33%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.92%

Weight gaps

All 81 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in RPV and VTV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in RPVMore in VTVGap
Centene CorpCNCRPV +2.79 points
Humana IncHUMRPV +2.42 points
ExxonMobil Holdings CorpXOMVTV +2.06 points
Dow IncDOWRPV +1.93 points
Archer-Daniels-Midland CoADMRPV +1.81 points
Target CorpTGTRPV +1.67 points
Tyson Foods IncTSNRPV +1.63 points
General Motors CoGMRPV +1.58 points

All 118 RPV holdings⁠All 298 VTV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RPV vs VTV Cost

Overpaying RPV vs VTV

$6,488

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RPV 0.35%

    $7,126

  • VTV 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RPV 0.35%
  • VTV 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RPV $7,126VTV $638

Year by year

YearRPVVTVOverpaying
10$634$55$579
20$2,454$216$2,238
30$7,126$638$6,488

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%RPV
  • 0.03%VTV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Value Index funds
  • Median 0.20%

VTV cheapest of 40 funds

RPV 28th cheapest of 40 funds

RPV vs VTV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
RPV 2.07%, better
VTV 1.83%
Payout (12M)
RPV $2.53
VTV $4.16
Last payment
RPV $0.63
VTV $1.02
Ex-dividend
RPV Sep 21, 2026
VTV Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
RPV Sep 25, 2026
VTV Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
RPV Quarterly
VTV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RPVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RPV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.31; Jun 16, 2017 $0.29; Sep 15, 2017 $0.30; Dec 15, 2017 $0.24; Mar 16, 2018 $0.33; Jun 15, 2018 $0.31; Sep 24, 2018 $0.38; Dec 24, 2018 $0.39; Mar 18, 2019 $0.39; Jun 24, 2019 $0.40; Sep 23, 2019 $0.42; Dec 23, 2019 $0.37; Mar 23, 2020 $0.46; Jun 22, 2020 $0.32; Sep 21, 2020 $0.30; Dec 21, 2020 $0.22; Mar 22, 2021 $0.41; Jun 21, 2021 $0.29; Sep 20, 2021 $0.42; Dec 20, 2021 $0.44; Mar 21, 2022 $0.25; Jun 21, 2022 $0.48; Sep 19, 2022 $0.51; Dec 19, 2022 $0.54; Mar 20, 2023 $0.50; Jun 20, 2023 $0.50; Sep 18, 2023 $0.46; Dec 18, 2023 $0.50; Mar 18, 2024 $0.53; Jun 24, 2024 $0.41; Sep 23, 2024 $0.50; Dec 23, 2024 $0.50; Mar 24, 2025 $0.67; Jun 23, 2025 $0.55; Sep 22, 2025 $0.82; Dec 22, 2025 $0.55; Mar 23, 2026 $0.67; Jun 22, 2026 $0.68; Sep 21, 2026 $0.63. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VTVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VTV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.56; Sep 22, 2017 $0.68; Dec 21, 2017 $0.65; Mar 22, 2018 $0.60; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 28, 2018 $0.73; Dec 24, 2018 $0.71; Mar 28, 2019 $0.73; Jun 27, 2019 $0.70; Sep 16, 2019 $0.66; Dec 24, 2019 $0.91; Mar 26, 2020 $0.76; Jun 25, 2020 $0.77; Sep 25, 2020 $0.72; Dec 24, 2020 $0.79; Mar 25, 2021 $0.71; Jun 24, 2021 $0.74; Sep 24, 2021 $0.81; Dec 27, 2021 $0.90; Mar 23, 2022 $0.79; Jun 23, 2022 $0.84; Sep 23, 2022 $0.86; Dec 22, 2022 $1.04; Mar 23, 2023 $0.82; Jun 23, 2023 $0.92; Sep 21, 2023 $0.90; Dec 21, 2023 $1.03; Mar 21, 2024 $1.01; Jun 27, 2024 $1.01; Sep 26, 2024 $0.91; Dec 23, 2024 $0.98; Mar 27, 2025 $1.01; Jun 30, 2025 $0.96; Sep 29, 2025 $0.94; Dec 22, 2025 $0.99; Mar 27, 2026 $1.08; Jun 26, 2026 $1.08; Sep 28, 2026 $1.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

RPV vs VTV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RPV
  • VTV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: RPV −22.6% · Oct 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RPV 13.9%VTV 11.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RPV 1.28VTV 1.44, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RPV −22.6%VTV −17.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RPV 0.75VTV 0.75Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

RPV and VTV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RPVBvsSCHVA

    Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VTVAvsSCHVA

    Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPVBvsIUSVA

    Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VTVAvsVFVAC

    Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPVBvsIWDA

    Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VTVAvsIUSVA

    Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.