Skip to content
etf.net

RSDE vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December

RSDEDNYSE Arca

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

RSDE0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 5.8×the volume

RSDE23.5KZALT135K

RSDE vs ZALT Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+13.2%RSDE+6.0%ZALT

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. RSDE +13.2%. ZALT +6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%10%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RSDE 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
RSDE $32M
ZALT $845M
1Y total return
RSDE +13.2%, better
ZALT +6.0%
Holdings
RSDE 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
RSDE 23.5K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
RSDE $24.52
ZALT $34.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RSDE: Cost 11, Risk 78, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings not scored, Durability 34. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 80, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for RSDE, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRSDEZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightA78A80Higher
Tradability15% weightD36B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightD34B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RSDE and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and RSDE 72nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 72DMAYZTrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 72DRSDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 34
  5. Rank 76DAPRZTrueShares Structured Outcome (April) ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RSDEDFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

RSDE No data

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

RSDE No data

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

RSDE No data

  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

RSDE No data

  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full RSDE profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

RSDE vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RSDE vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying RSDE vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RSDE 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RSDE 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RSDE $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearRSDEZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%RSDE
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

RSDE 60th cheapest of 77 funds

RSDE vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
RSDE None
ZALT None

Distribution history

RSDEAll RSDE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RSDE vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RSDE 6.6%since Jan 2025ZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RSDE 1.00since Jan 2025ZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RSDE −10.7%since Dec 2024ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RSDE 0.35ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • RSDEDvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RSDEDvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RSDEDvsBUFMB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - December · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsBUFMB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.