Skip to content

RSPT vs SEMI

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

RSPTBNYSE Arca

Columbia Select Technology ETF

SEMIFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RSPT −0.35pt a year

RSPT0.40%SEMI0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

RSPT 77.7×the volume

RSPT689KSEMI8.86K

3Y return · a year

RSPT +3.7pt

RSPT+31.4%SEMI+27.7%

RSPT vs SEMI Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+32.2%RSPT+11.6%SEMI

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. RSPT +32.2%. SEMI +11.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%20%40%50%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RSPT 0.40%, better
SEMI 0.75%
Fund size
RSPT $5.94B
SEMI $41M
1Y total return
RSPT +32.2%, better
SEMI +11.6%
Yield (12M)
RSPT 0.25%
SEMI 3.88%, better
Holdings
RSPT 78
SEMI 36
Avg volume (30D)
RSPT 689K sh, better
SEMI 8.86K sh
NAV per share
RSPT $62.97
SEMI $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RSPT: Cost 54, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 69, Holdings 88, Durability 74. SEMI: Cost 13, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 36, Durability 15.
Pillar letters and Scores for RSPT, SEMI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRSPTSEMI
Cost30% weightC54HigherF13
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA81HigherD32
Tradability15% weightB69HigherD31
Holdings10% weightA88HigherD36
Durability5% weightA74HigherF15

Rank among Technology (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RSPT and SEMI are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Technology (Broad)⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

RSPT ranks 4th and SEMI 21st of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AFTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3AVGTVanguard Information Technology ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 4BRSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BIGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 20FQQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETFScore 24
  7. Rank 21FSEMIColumbia Select Technology ETFScore 23
  8. Rank 22FTEKiShares Technology Opportunities Active ETFScore 20

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RSPTBInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

SEMIFColumbia Select Technology ETF

In short

RSPT Tech without the megacap gravity. RSPT hands each of the S&P 500's roughly 80 technology names the same slice and resets every quarter, so the sector's giants carry no more weight than its smaller names.

SEMI No data

Stated mandate

RSPT The Fund is designed to follow the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index, investing at least 90% of assets in index securities. The index equally weights information technology stocks from the S&P 500 and rebalances quarterly.

SEMI No data

Why people hold it

  • RSPT Equal weight by design: about 80 S&P 500 tech stocks, one identical slice each, rebalanced quarterly. No single giant steers the fund.invesco.com
  • Running since 2006 and it hews closely to its index. A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so getting in and out is rarely the hard part.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded broad-tech aisle, with a plain index mandate and quarterly distributions.

SEMI No data

Worth knowing

  • RSPT 0.40% a year lands mid-pack for tech sector funds but well above cap-weighted majors like VGT (0.09%), XLK (0.08%) and FTEC (0.08%).
  • Equal weighting leans on the sector's smaller members and the quarterly reset trims what ran up. Expect it to move to a different beat than cap-weighted tech.
  • Still a single-sector fund: everything inside is S&P 500 information technology, with the concentration that implies.

SEMI No data

Full RSPT profile⁠

Full SEMI profile⁠

RSPT vs SEMI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RSPT vs SEMI Cost

Overpaying SEMI vs RSPT

$6,392

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RSPT 0.40%

    $8,090

  • SEMI 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RSPT 0.40%
  • SEMI 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SEMI $14,482RSPT $8,090

Year by year

YearRSPTSEMIOverpaying
10$723$1,336$613
20$2,793$5,078$2,285
30$8,090$14,482$6,392

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%RSPT, cheaper
  • 0.75%SEMI
  • Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.45%

RSPT 11th cheapest of 23 funds

SEMI 19th cheapest of 23 funds

RSPT vs SEMI Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
RSPT 0.25%
SEMI 3.88%, better
Payout (12M)
RSPT $0.15
SEMI $1.37
Last payment
RSPT $0.03
SEMI $1.37
Ex-dividend
RSPT Sep 21, 2026
SEMI Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
RSPT Sep 25, 2026
SEMI Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
RSPT Quarterly
SEMI Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RSPTQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RSPT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.02; Jun 16, 2017 $0.03; Sep 15, 2017 $0.03; Dec 15, 2017 $0.04; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 15, 2018 $0.03; Sep 24, 2018 $0.04; Dec 24, 2018 $0.04; Mar 18, 2019 $0.04; Jun 24, 2019 $0.05; Sep 23, 2019 $0.04; Dec 23, 2019 $0.05; Mar 23, 2020 $0.08; Jun 22, 2020 $0.08; Sep 21, 2020 $0.08; Dec 21, 2020 $0.09; Mar 22, 2021 $0.05; Jun 21, 2021 $0.04; Sep 20, 2021 $0.04; Dec 20, 2021 $0.04; Mar 21, 2022 $0.04; Jun 21, 2022 $0.04; Sep 19, 2022 $0.04; Dec 19, 2022 $0.05; Mar 20, 2023 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.04; Sep 18, 2023 $0.04; Dec 18, 2023 $0.05; Mar 18, 2024 $0.04; Jun 24, 2024 $0.04; Sep 23, 2024 $0.04; Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.04; Jun 23, 2025 $0.05; Sep 22, 2025 $0.04; Dec 22, 2025 $0.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.04; Jun 22, 2026 $0.04; Sep 21, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
SEMIAnnual · 4 paymentsAll SEMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2022 $0.10; Dec 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2024 $0.25; Dec 18, 2025 $1.37. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

RSPT vs SEMI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RSPT 22.0%, betterSEMI 24.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RSPT 1.23, betterSEMI 1.02
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RSPT −32.5%SEMI −32.9%since Mar 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RSPT 1.53SEMI 1.52

RSPT and SEMI in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RSPTBvsXLKA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMIFvsXLKA

    Columbia Select Technology ETF · State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPTBvsFTECA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMIFvsFTECA

    Columbia Select Technology ETF · Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPTBvsVGTA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMIFvsVGTA

    Columbia Select Technology ETF · Vanguard Information Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.