Skip to content

RWM vs SCC

ProShares Short Russell2000

RWMBNYSE Arca

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary

SCCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

13.6%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

RWM0.95%SCC0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

RWM 2091.0×the volume

RWM30MSCC14.4K

10Y return · a year

RWM +14.8pt

RWM−11.3%SCC−26.1%

RWM vs SCC Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

−15.9%RWM−56.1%SCC

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. RWM −15.9%. SCC −56.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%25%50%75%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RWM 0.95%
SCC 0.95%
Fund size
RWM $163M
SCC $3M
1Y total return
RWM −10.1%
SCC +1.0%, better
Yield (12M)
RWM 3.31%, better
SCC 2.89%
Holdings
RWM 3
SCC 1
Avg volume (30D)
RWM 30M sh, better
SCC 14.4K sh
NAV per share
RWM $14.37
SCC $14.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RWM: Cost 50, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 90, Holdings 63, Durability 69. SCC: Cost 50, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for RWM, SCC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRWMSCC
Cost30% weightC50C50
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60HigherC54
Tradability15% weightA90HigherB55
Holdings10% weightB63Not scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherC45

Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RWM and SCC are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 53 ›

RWM ranks 4th and SCC 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1BDOGProShares Short Dow30Score 65
  2. Rank 1BPSQProShares Short QQQScore 65
  3. Rank 1BSVXYProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4BRWMProShares Short Russell2000Score 63
  5. Rank 5BSJBProShares Short High YieldScore 62
  6. Rank 32CSBBProShares Short SmallCap600Score 40
  7. Rank 32CSCCProShares UltraShort Consumer DiscretionaryScore 40
  8. Rank 32CSDPProShares UltraShort UtilitiesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RWMBProShares Short Russell2000

SCCCProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary

In short

RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

SCC The only -2x ETF pointed at the consumer discretionary sector, and it has been listed since 2007. SCC resets daily, so it is built as a short-horizon trading tool, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.

SCC The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to negative two times the daily performance of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.

Why people hold it

  • RWM Straight -1x, not a multiplier: it tracks the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, where stablemate TWM targets -2x on the same index.proshares.com
  • ProShares calls it the only -1x ETF tied to the Russell 2000, the index of the 2,000 smallest US names in the Russell 3000.proshares.comproshares.com 2
  • Trading since January 2007 and one of the busier funds in the inverse-equity aisle, so entering and exiting is rarely the hard part.
  • Fee is 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.05% gross), near what this category charges, and it rates among the strongest builds in its peer group.
  • SCC ProShares describes it as the only -2x ETF built to gain when the consumer discretionary sector falls on the day. Retail, autos and restaurants, geared short, in one ticker.proshares.com
  • 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (gross 2.98%), near the category median. Siblings DOG, PSQ and RWM also sit at 0.95% net, each waived through that same date.
  • Listed since 2007, a long run for a daily-reset fund, with the -2x daily objective and the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index named plainly in the fund's own documents.proshares.com

Worth knowing

  • RWM The -1x target resets daily. Hold longer and compounding rules: ProShares says multi-day returns can differ significantly from the target, in amount and even direction.proshares.comproshares.com 2
  • Symmetric by design: on days the Russell 2000 climbs, the fund is built to lose roughly as much as the index gains.proshares.com
  • Fund documents tell investors to monitor holdings as frequently as daily, which puts this at the hands-on end of the shelf.proshares.com
  • SCC The -2x figure is a one-day target. Hold longer and compounding can push results away from -2x the index move over that stretch, especially through choppy markets.proshares.com
  • Small asset base and light trading for the category, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than on the heavily traded broad-index inverse funds.
  • Across ProShares' inverse shelf, the broad-market siblings review stronger; this sector-specific version sits in the lower part of its peer group on cost, scale and tradability.

Full RWM profile⁠

Full SCC profile⁠

RWM vs SCC Holdings

How RWM and SCC differ

Overlap by weight

13.6%

Shared holdings make up 100% of SCC and 13.6% of RWM.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both13.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for SCC.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for SCC.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • RWM100.0%
  • SCC100.0%

Securities held

  • RWM2
  • SCC0

Asset class

RWM
Equity
SCC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in RWM2
  • In both0
  • Only in SCC0

Only in RWM

2 securities, 86.4% of RWM by weight

  • Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf81.69%
  • TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%

Only in SCC

0 securities, 0.0% of SCC by weight

Weight gaps

RWM and SCC share no securities.

All 12 RWM holdings⁠All 7 SCC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RWM vs SCC Cost

Same expense ratio

$17,869

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RWM 0.95%

    $17,869

  • SCC 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RWM 0.95%
  • SCC 0.95%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RWM $17,869SCC $17,869

Year by year

YearRWMSCC
10$1,678$1,678
20$6,322$6,322
30$17,869$17,869

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%RWM
  • 0.95%SCC
  • Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds

SCC 6th cheapest of 53 funds

RWM vs SCC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
RWM 3.31%, better
SCC 2.89%
Payout (12M)
RWM $0.48
SCC $0.41
Last payment
RWM $0.09
SCC $0.11
Ex-dividend
RWM Sep 23, 2026
SCC Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
RWM Sep 29, 2026
SCC Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
RWM Quarterly
SCC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RWMQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll RWM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.03; Mar 21, 2018 $0.04; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Sep 26, 2018 $0.14; Dec 26, 2018 $0.13; Mar 20, 2019 $0.11; Jun 25, 2019 $0.18; Sep 25, 2019 $0.15; Dec 24, 2019 $0.14; Mar 25, 2020 $0.05; Dec 22, 2022 $0.10; Mar 22, 2023 $0.15; Jun 21, 2023 $0.24; Sep 20, 2023 $0.27; Dec 20, 2023 $0.35; Mar 20, 2024 $0.26; Jun 26, 2024 $0.29; Sep 25, 2024 $0.28; Dec 23, 2024 $0.30; Mar 26, 2025 $0.14; Jun 25, 2025 $0.20; Sep 24, 2025 $0.13; Dec 24, 2025 $0.18; Mar 25, 2026 $0.06; Jun 24, 2026 $0.14; Sep 23, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SCCQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll SCC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 21, 2018 $0.18; Sep 21, 2022 $0.15; Mar 20, 2024 $0.25; Jun 26, 2024 $0.25; Dec 23, 2024 $0.42; Mar 26, 2025 $0.07; Jun 25, 2025 $0.26; Sep 24, 2025 $0.21; Dec 24, 2025 $0.15; Mar 25, 2026 $0.05; Jun 24, 2026 $0.09; Sep 23, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

RWM vs SCC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RWM
  • SCC
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: SCC −78.7% · Jan 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−80%−60%−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RWM 18.4%, betterSCC 34.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RWM −0.99SCC −0.88, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RWM −43.7%, betterSCC −78.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RWM −1.23SCC −2.25

Popular comparisons

  • RWMBvsDOGB

    ProShares Short Russell2000 · ProShares Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCCCvsDOGB

    ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary · ProShares Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWMBvsPSQB

    ProShares Short Russell2000 · ProShares Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCCCvsPSQB

    ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary · ProShares Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWMBvsSVXYB

    ProShares Short Russell2000 · ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCCCvsSVXYB

    ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary · ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.