RWM ranks 4th and SCC 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SCC
13.6%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 2091.0×the volume
30M14.4K
RWM +14.8pt
−11.3%−26.1%
RWM vs SCC Performance
−15.9%−56.1%
- RWM 0.95%
- SCC 0.95%
- RWM $163M
- SCC $3M
- RWM −10.1%
- SCC +1.0%, better
- RWM 3.31%, better
- SCC 2.89%
- RWM 3
- SCC 1
- RWM 30M sh, better
- SCC 14.4K sh
- RWM $14.37
- SCC $14.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SCC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C45 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SCC are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SCCC
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SCC The only -2x ETF pointed at the consumer discretionary sector, and it has been listed since 2007. SCC resets daily, so it is built as a short-horizon trading tool, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SCC The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to negative two times the daily performance of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SCC Holdings
How RWM and SCC differ
13.6%
Shared holdings make up 100% of SCC and 13.6% of RWM.
Level by level
- Holdings13.6%
Sector
No Sector split for SCC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SCC.
Concentration
- RWM100.0%
- SCC100.0%
- RWM2
- SCC0
Asset class
- RWM
- Equity
- SCC
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in RWM2
- In both0
- Only in SCC0
Only in RWM
2 securities, 86.4% of RWM by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf81.69%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%
Only in SCC
0 securities, 0.0% of SCC by weight
Weight gaps
RWM and SCC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SCC Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SCC 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SCC |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%SCC
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SCC 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SCC Dividends
- RWM 3.31%, better
- SCC 2.89%
- RWM $0.48
- SCC $0.41
- RWM $0.09
- SCC $0.11
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SCC Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SCC Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- SCC Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs SCC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- SCC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterSCC 34.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99SCC −0.88, better
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%, betterSCC −78.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23SCC −2.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.