RWM ranks 4th and SIJ 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SIJ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 3248.4×the volume
30M9.24K
RWM +15.5pt
−11.3%−26.8%
RWM vs SIJ Performance
−15.9%−60.2%
- RWM 0.95%
- SIJ 0.95%
- RWM $163M
- SIJ $2M
- RWM −10.1%, better
- SIJ −16.9%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- SIJ 3.29%
- RWM 3
- SIJ 1
- RWM 30M sh, better
- SIJ 9.24K sh
- RWM $14.37
- SIJ $18.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SIJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C41 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SIJ are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SIJC
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SIJ Wall Street's only two-times inverse play on the industrials sector in ETF form: one ticker, machinery-to-airlines exposure flipped upside down, reset at the end of every trading day since 2007.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SIJ SIJ seeks, before fees and expenses, daily investment results equal to twice the inverse of the S&P Industrials Select Sector Index’s daily performance. It is intended to gain when the industrials sector declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SIJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SIJ Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SIJ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SIJ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%SIJ
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SIJ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SIJ Dividends
- RWM 3.31%, better
- SIJ 3.29%
- RWM $0.48
- SIJ $0.61
- RWM $0.09
- SIJ $0.13
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SIJ Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SIJ Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- SIJ Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs SIJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- SIJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterSIJ 31.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99, betterSIJ −1.08
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%, betterSIJ −78.9%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23SIJ −1.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.