RWM ranks 4th and SJB 5th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SJB
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 204.5×the volume
30M147K
SJB +8.0pt
−11.1%−3.1%
RWM vs SJB Performance
−18.3%+2.4%
- RWM 0.95%
- SJB 0.95%
- RWM $163M
- SJB $68M
- RWM −10.2%
- SJB +3.2%, better
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SJB 3.23%
- RWM 3
- SJB 2
- RWM 30M sh, better
- SJB 147K sh
- RWM $14.37
- SJB $15.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SJB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A90Higher | A75 |
| Holdings | B63 | A100Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SJB are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SJBB
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SJB One of the few single-ticker ways to take the other side of the junk bond market: SJB aims for the inverse (-1x) of the daily move in the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SJB The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SJB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SJB Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SJB 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SJB |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%SJB
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SJB 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SJB Dividends
- RWM 3.32%, better
- SJB 3.23%
- RWM $0.48
- SJB $0.50
- RWM $0.09
- SJB $0.12
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SJB Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SJB Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- SJB Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs SJB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- SJB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%SJB 4.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99, betterSJB −1.46
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%SJB −13.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23SJB −0.68
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.