RWM ranks 4th and SRS 14th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs SRS
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 2322.5×the volume
33.1M14.3K
RWM +6.7pt
−10.9%−17.6%
RWM vs SRS Performance
−14.5%−17.4%
- RWM 0.95%
- SRS 0.95%
- RWM $202M
- SRS $16M
- RWM −13.0%, better
- SRS −17.2%
- RWM 3.36%
- SRS 3.39%, better
- RWM 3
- SRS 2
- RWM 33.1M sh, better
- SRS 14.3K sh
- RWM $14.66
- SRS $39.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | B56Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B56 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and SRS are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
SRSB
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SRS The one-ticker way to lean against US real estate with leverage: SRS targets twice the inverse of the S&P 500's real estate sector, recalculated every single day. It has been running since 2007, just as the housing market cracked.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
SRS The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse performance of the S&P Real Estate Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs SRS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs SRS Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
SRS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%SRS
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SRS 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs SRS Dividends
- RWM 3.36%
- SRS 3.39%, better
- RWM $0.48
- SRS $1.31
- RWM $0.09
- SRS $0.33
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- SRS Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- SRS Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Quarterly
- SRS Quarterly
Distribution history
RWM vs SRS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- SRS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterSRS 33.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99SRS −0.59, better
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%, betterSRS −54.8%
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.11SRS −1.87
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.