Skip to content

RZV vs SCHV

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF

RZVCNYSE Arca

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

SCHVANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.1%by weight

Expense ratio

SCHV −0.31pt a year

RZV0.35%SCHV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHV 480.6×the volume

RZV6.64KSCHV3.19M

10Y return · a year

SCHV +1.3pt

RZV+10.0%SCHV+11.3%

RZV vs SCHV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+48.9%RZV+61.1%SCHV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. RZV +48.9%. SCHV +61.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RZV 0.35%
SCHV 0.04%, better
Fund size
RZV $278M
SCHV $15.4B
1Y total return
RZV +27.8%, better
SCHV +22.1%
Yield (12M)
RZV 1.41%
SCHV 1.81%, better
Holdings
RZV 158
SCHV 567
Avg volume (30D)
RZV 6.64K sh
SCHV 3.19M sh, better
NAV per share
RZV $140.93
SCHV $33.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RZV: Cost 28, Risk 13, Mission 84, Tradability 33, Holdings 56, Durability 50. SCHV: Cost 96, Risk 70, Mission 89, Tradability 95, Holdings 59, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for RZV, SCHV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRZVSCHV
Cost30% weightD28A96Higher
Mission25% weightA84A89Higher
Risk15% weightF13A70Higher
Tradability15% weightD33A95Higher
Holdings10% weightB56B59Higher
Durability5% weightC50B68Higher

Rank among US Value Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RZV and SCHV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Value Index⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

SCHV ranks 1st and RZV 34th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AVTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETFScore 82
  3. Rank 34CFYTFirst Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX FundScore 44
  4. Rank 34CRZVInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 36CVMAXHartford US Value ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RZVCInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF

SCHVASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

In short

RZV Most S&P 600 value funds keep every stock with a whiff of value and weight it by size. RZV keeps only the deepest discounts and weights them by how cheap they are, not how big.

SCHV No data

Stated mandate

RZV The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise its Index.

SCHV No data

Why people hold it

  • RZV Screens the S&P SmallCap 600 for the strongest value scores on book value, earnings and sales versus price, then weights holdings by that score instead of market cap.spglobal.cominvesco.com
  • A pure-style build: only parent-index names showing strong value traits get in, so the sleeve stays a value sleeve rather than a small-cap blend in disguise.spglobal.com
  • Running since 2006, through several full value cycles, and it has tracked its index closely along the way.

SCHV No data

Worth knowing

  • RZV Costs 0.35% a year, roughly double the median for S&P 600 index funds and more than the 0.15% SLYV charges for a broader value cut.
  • Trades far lighter than core S&P 600 giants like IJR and SPSM, so spreads can be wider, especially in fast markets.
  • Roughly 160 stocks, rebalanced once a year, leaning into the market's cheapest corners. Weights can drift between resets, and deep value is a narrow slice.invesco.com

SCHV No data

Full RZV profile⁠

Full SCHV profile⁠

RZV vs SCHV Holdings

How RZV and SCHV differ

Overlap by weight

0.1%

Shared holdings make up 4.2% of RZV and 0.1% of SCHV.

Level by level

  • Holdings6 in both0.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors70.8%
  • Countryby domicile98.9%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in RZV and SCHV, widest gap first
SectorMore in RZVMore in SCHVGap
Consumer DiscretionaryRZV +17.5 points
FinancialsSCHV +12.7 points
Health CareSCHV +7.5 points
IndustrialsRZV +5.3 points
TechnologySCHV +4.7 points
UtilitiesSCHV +3.9 points
MaterialsRZV +3.9 points
Consumer StaplesRZV +2.3 points
EnergyRZV +0.4 points
CommunicationSCHV +0.3 points
Real EstateSCHV +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in RZV and SCHV, widest gap first
CountryMore in RZVMore in SCHVGap
SingaporeRZV +0.8 points
SwitzerlandSCHV +0.6 points
Other countries (6)SCHV +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • RZV17.8%
  • SCHV19.9%

Securities held

  • RZV157
  • SCHV566

Asset class

RZV
Stocks
SCHV
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in RZV151
  • In both6
  • Only in SCHV560

Only in RZV

151 securities, 95.7% of RZV by weight

  • Acadia Healthcare Co Inc2.40%
  • MarineMax Inc2.11%
  • Coty Inc1.96%

Only in SCHV

560 securities, 99.8% of SCHV by weight

  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B3.57%
  • JPMorgan Chase2.98%
  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp2.29%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in RZV and SCHV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in RZVMore in SCHVGap
CarMax IncKMXRZV +1.18 points
Conagra Brands IncCAGRZV +0.98 points
Mohawk Industries IncMHKRZV +0.72 points
Molson Coors Beverage CoTAPRZV +0.62 points
Builders FirstSource IncBLDRRZV +0.31 points
Eastman Chemical CoEMNRZV +0.28 points

All 157 RZV holdings⁠All 569 SCHV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RZV vs SCHV Cost

Overpaying RZV vs SCHV

$6,277

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RZV 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SCHV 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RZV 0.35%
  • SCHV 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RZV $7,126SCHV $849

Year by year

YearRZVSCHVOverpaying
10$634$73$561
20$2,454$288$2,166
30$7,126$849$6,277

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%RZV
  • 0.04%SCHV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Value Index funds
  • Median 0.20%

SCHV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds

RZV 28th cheapest of 40 funds

RZV vs SCHV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
RZV 1.41%
SCHV 1.81%, better
Payout (12M)
RZV $2.04
SCHV $0.63
Last payment
RZV $0.54
SCHV $0.16
Ex-dividend
RZV Sep 21, 2026
SCHV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
RZV Sep 25, 2026
SCHV Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
RZV Quarterly
SCHV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RZVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll RZV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.20; Jun 16, 2017 $0.20; Sep 15, 2017 $0.22; Dec 15, 2017 $0.13; Mar 16, 2018 $0.30; Jun 15, 2018 $0.28; Sep 24, 2018 $0.36; Dec 24, 2018 $0.23; Mar 18, 2019 $0.20; Jun 24, 2019 $0.19; Sep 23, 2019 $0.17; Dec 23, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.17; Jun 22, 2020 $0.07; Sep 21, 2020 $0.09; Dec 21, 2020 $0.09; Mar 22, 2021 $0.20; Jun 21, 2021 $0.16; Sep 20, 2021 $0.21; Dec 20, 2021 $0.26; Mar 21, 2022 $0.26; Jun 21, 2022 $0.29; Sep 19, 2022 $0.37; Dec 19, 2022 $0.34; Mar 20, 2023 $0.32; Jun 20, 2023 $0.34; Sep 18, 2023 $0.27; Dec 18, 2023 $0.29; Mar 18, 2024 $0.33; Jun 24, 2024 $0.29; Sep 23, 2024 $0.33; Dec 23, 2024 $0.32; Mar 24, 2025 $0.52; Jun 23, 2025 $0.38; Sep 22, 2025 $0.58; Dec 22, 2025 $0.41; Mar 23, 2026 $0.51; Jun 22, 2026 $0.58; Sep 21, 2026 $0.54. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SCHVQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll SCHV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.10; Jun 19, 2017 $0.10; Sep 18, 2017 $0.11; Dec 18, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 26, 2018 $0.12; Sep 25, 2018 $0.13; Dec 12, 2018 $0.14; Mar 20, 2019 $0.13; Jun 26, 2019 $0.13; Sep 25, 2019 $0.14; Dec 12, 2019 $0.21; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.12; Sep 23, 2020 $0.22; Dec 10, 2020 $0.13; Mar 24, 2021 $0.10; Jun 23, 2021 $0.12; Sep 22, 2021 $0.12; Dec 8, 2021 $0.14; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0023; Mar 23, 2022 $0.11; Jun 22, 2022 $0.13; Sep 21, 2022 $0.13; Dec 7, 2022 $0.15; Mar 22, 2023 $0.13; Jun 21, 2023 $0.13; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 6, 2023 $0.16; Mar 20, 2024 $0.13; Jun 26, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 11, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.14; Jun 25, 2025 $0.15; Sep 24, 2025 $0.15; Dec 10, 2025 $0.17; Mar 25, 2026 $0.14; Jun 24, 2026 $0.16; Sep 23, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

RZV vs SCHV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RZV
  • SCHV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: RZV −29.8% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RZV 22.3%SCHV 11.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RZV 0.77SCHV 1.31, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RZV −29.8%SCHV −19.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RZV 1.14SCHV 0.83

RZV and SCHV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RZVCvsVTVA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsVTVA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RZVCvsIUSVA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsIUSVA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RZVCvsIWDA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsIWDA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.