VTV ranks 2nd and RZV 34th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
RZV vs VTV
VTV −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
VTV 429.7×the volume
6.64K2.85M
VTV +2.7pt
+10.0%+12.7%
RZV vs VTV Performance
+48.9%+76.4%
- RZV 0.35%
- VTV 0.03%, better
- RZV $278M
- VTV $184B
- RZV +27.8%, better
- VTV +24.6%
- RZV 1.41%
- VTV 1.83%, better
- RZV 158
- VTV 311
- RZV 6.64K sh
- VTV 2.85M sh, better
- RZV $140.93
- VTV $223.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RZV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A84 | A89Higher |
| Risk | F13 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C50 |
| Durability | C50 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. RZV and VTV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RZVC
VTVA
In short
RZV Most S&P 600 value funds keep every stock with a whiff of value and weight it by size. RZV keeps only the deepest discounts and weights them by how cheap they are, not how big.
VTV Value investing for three cents on every hundred dollars a year. Since 2004, VTV has run a passive, fully invested portfolio of roughly 300 large US companies that screen cheap, at a fee near the industry floor.
Stated mandate
RZV The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise its Index.
VTV The fund seeks to track a large-capitalization U.S. value-stock benchmark through passive indexing and substantial replication of that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RZV vs VTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RZV vs VTV Cost
Overpaying RZV vs VTV
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RZV 0.35%
$7,126
VTV 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RZV | VTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%RZV
- 0.03%VTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
VTV cheapest of 40 funds
RZV 28th cheapest of 40 funds
RZV vs VTV Dividends
- RZV 1.41%
- VTV 1.83%, better
- RZV $2.04
- VTV $4.16
- RZV $0.54
- VTV $1.02
- RZV Sep 21, 2026
- VTV Sep 28, 2026
- RZV Sep 25, 2026
- VTV Sep 30, 2026
- RZV Quarterly
- VTV Quarterly
Distribution history
RZV vs VTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RZV
- VTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RZV 22.3%VTV 11.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- RZV 0.77VTV 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- RZV −29.8%VTV −17.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RZV 1.14VTV 0.75
RZV and VTV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





