SCAU ranks 7th and SNOV 13th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.
SCAU vs SNOV
SCAU −0.60pt a year
0.30%0.90%
SNOV 6.9×the volume
1.2K8.26K
SCAU vs SNOV Performance
−2.7%+1.5%
- SCAU 0.30%, better
- SNOV 0.90%
- SCAU $1M
- SNOV $112M
- SCAU
- SNOV +13.2%
- SCAU 4
- SNOV 3
- SCAU 1.2K sh
- SNOV 8.26K sh, better
- SCAU $24.25
- SNOV $27.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCAU | SNOV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F8 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F22 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | |
| Durability | F6 | A83Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. SCAU and SNOV are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCAUC
SNOVD
In short
SNOV A buffer built on small caps, not the S&P 500. It uses options on the Russell 2000 to absorb the first 15% of a year's losses, with upside capped at a level set each November when the period resets.
Stated mandate
SNOV The Fund seeks to match the price return of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over its stated target outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCAU vs SNOV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCAU vs SNOV Cost
Overpaying SNOV vs SCAU
$10,891
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCAU 0.30%
$6,149
SNOV 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCAU | SNOV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,593 | $1,048 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $6,015 | $3,902 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $17,040 | $10,891 |
- 0.30%SCAU, cheaper
- 0.90%SNOV
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.77%
SCAU cheapest of 14 funds
SNOV 12th cheapest of 14 funds
SCAU vs SNOV Dividends
- SCAU None
- SNOV None
Distribution history
SCAU vs SNOV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCAU SNOV 8.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCAU SNOV 0.85
- Worst fall
- SCAU SNOV −15.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SCAU 0.00SNOV 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.