SCHZ ranks 2nd and SCEC 65th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCEC vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCHZ 27.1×the volume
87.5K2.37M
SCEC vs SCHZ Performance
−0.9%−0.2%
- SCEC 0.39%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- SCEC $617M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- SCEC −0.9%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- SCEC 5.17%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- SCEC 362
- SCHZ 12610
- SCEC 87.5K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- SCEC $24.09
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCEC | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | C40 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A78Higher |
| Durability | D34 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCEC and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCECB
SCHZA
In short
SCEC A core bond fund that declines to take core bond rate risk. Sterling's active team stays anchored in investment-grade credit but holds average duration to 18 months or less, so yield swings hit the portfolio far more softly.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
SCEC The Fund seeks enhanced core-bond exposure by actively allocating primarily to fixed-income securities, with investment-grade bonds as the main focus and limited below-investment-grade exposure. It maintains an average duration of 18 months or less.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCEC vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCEC vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying SCEC vs SCHZ
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCEC 0.39%
$7,898
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCEC | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%SCEC
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
SCEC 67th cheapest of 114 funds
SCEC vs SCHZ Dividends
- SCEC 5.17%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- SCEC $1.24
- SCHZ $0.96
- SCEC $0.10
- SCHZ $0.08
- SCEC Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- SCEC Oct 5, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- SCEC Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
SCEC vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCEC 4.1%SCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCEC −0.52SCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- SCEC −4.8%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- SCEC 0.09SCHZ 0.99
SCEC and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
