Skip to content

SCHD vs VIG

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

SCHDANYSE Arca

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

VIGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VIG −0.02pt a year

SCHD0.06%VIG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHD 22.0×the volume

SCHD22.9MVIG1.04M

10Y return · a year

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

SCHD+13.7%VIG+13.7%

SCHD vs VIG Performance

Nov 5, 2021 – Nov 6, 2026

+59.9%SCHD+59.5%VIG

Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 6, 2026. SCHD +59.9%. VIG +59.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
SCHD 0.06%
VIG 0.04%, better
Fund size
SCHD $120B
VIG $109B
1Y total return
SCHD +37.2%, better
VIG +14.8%
Yield (12M)
SCHD 3.00%, better
VIG 1.50%
Holdings
SCHD 100
VIG 343
Avg volume (30D)
SCHD 22.9M sh, better
VIG 1.04M sh
NAV per share
SCHD $35.40
VIG $252.69
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SCHD: Cost 95, Risk 73, Mission 85, Tradability 90, Holdings 32, Durability 84. VIG: Cost 100, Risk 57, Mission 86, Tradability 59, Holdings 52, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for SCHD, VIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSCHDVIG
Cost30% weightA95A100Higher
Mission25% weightA85A86Higher
Risk15% weightA73HigherB57
Tradability15% weightA90HigherB59
Holdings10% weightD32C52Higher
Durability5% weightA84A91Higher

Rank among US Dividend Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SCHD and VIG are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Dividend Index⁠

Category · 52 funds
See all 52 ›

SCHD ranks 2nd and VIG 5th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ADGROiShares Core Dividend Growth ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3ASPYDState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETFScore 80
  4. Rank 4ADIVBiShares Core Dividend ETFScore 79
  5. Rank 5AVIGVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETFScore 78
  6. Rank 6ADLNWisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend FundScore 74

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SCHDASchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

VIGAVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF

In short

SCHD The dividend fund that checks the balance sheet before it checks the yield. SCHD only considers companies with 10 straight years of payouts, then ranks the survivors on cash flow, return on equity and dividend growth. Quality gate first, income second, at six basis points.

VIG VIG buys dividend growth, not fat yields: about 300 US companies with a record of raising their payouts, tracked for 0.04% a year. Running since 2006 and now north of $100 billion, it is the plain-vanilla anchor of the dividend-screen aisle.

Stated mandate

SCHD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100TM Index.

VIG The fund seeks to track the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which represents common stocks of companies with a record of increasing dividends over time.

Why people hold it

  • SCHD Charges 0.06% a year, near the floor for US equity ETFs and a fraction of what the typical dividend-screen fund costs.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • The rulebook is strict: 10 consecutive years of dividends to qualify, then a composite rank on cash-flow-to-total-debt, return on equity, yield and five-year dividend growth.spglobal.com
  • Index rules cap any single stock at 4.5% and any sector at 25%, so one hot name cannot quietly become the whole income stream.spglobal.com
  • Running since 2011 and now among the largest, most heavily traded dividend ETFs, with tracking that stays very close to its index.
  • VIG At 0.04% a year, the fee is roughly a tenth of the typical dividend-screen fund's 0.39%, and undercuts every other top-graded fund in the group, DGRO and SCHD included.
  • The screen rewards a record of increasing dividends rather than the biggest current payout, so the basket leans on payout discipline instead of stretched yields.
  • Live since 2006, over $100 billion in assets and actively traded, which shows up as easy fills rather than wide spreads.
  • About 300 holdings, cash paid quarterly, and one of the strongest overall implementations in its dividend-screen peer group.

Worth knowing

  • SCHD Roughly 100 names, every one a long-time dividend payer. The fast-growing non-payers that drive much of the US market are not eligible, by design.spglobal.com
  • The yield and quality screens tilt it toward mature, cash-generating sectors, so it looks nothing like a total-market fund. Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.spglobal.com
  • Not the absolute cheapest shelf item: VIG runs 0.04% and DIVB 0.05%, though both screen for dividends differently.
  • VIG Growth of payouts, not maximum income, is the mandate. That puts it on a different axis than high-dividend funds such as SPYD.
  • US stocks only, no bonds and no overseas payers, and sector weights are whatever the index screen spits out.
  • Portfolio risk and concentration measures land mid-pack for the category: it is fully invested in equities and drops when the market drops.

Full SCHD profile⁠

Full VIG profile⁠

SCHD vs VIG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SCHD vs VIG Cost

Overpaying SCHD vs VIG

$421

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SCHD 0.06%

    $1,270

  • VIG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SCHD 0.06%
  • VIG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K051015202530SCHD $1,270VIG $849

Year by year

YearSCHDVIGOverpaying
10$110$73$37
20$432$288$144
30$1,270$849$421

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%SCHD
  • 0.04%VIG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
  • Median 0.35%

VIG cheapest of 52 funds

SCHD 4th cheapest of 52 funds

SCHD vs VIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Yield (12M)
SCHD 3.00%, better
VIG 1.50%
Payout (12M)
SCHD $1.05
VIG $3.65
Last payment
SCHD $0.27
VIG $0.93
Ex-dividend
SCHD Sep 23, 2026
VIG Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
SCHD Sep 28, 2026
VIG Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
SCHD Quarterly
VIG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

SCHDQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SCHD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.11; Jun 19, 2017 $0.11; Sep 18, 2017 $0.10; Dec 18, 2017 $0.11; Mar 16, 2018 $0.09; Jun 26, 2018 $0.14; Sep 25, 2018 $0.12; Dec 12, 2018 $0.14; Mar 20, 2019 $0.12; Jun 26, 2019 $0.14; Sep 25, 2019 $0.16; Dec 12, 2019 $0.16; Mar 25, 2020 $0.15; Jun 24, 2020 $0.15; Sep 23, 2020 $0.18; Dec 10, 2020 $0.20; Mar 24, 2021 $0.17; Jun 23, 2021 $0.18; Sep 22, 2021 $0.20; Dec 8, 2021 $0.21; Mar 23, 2022 $0.17; Jun 22, 2022 $0.23; Sep 21, 2022 $0.21; Dec 7, 2022 $0.23; Mar 22, 2023 $0.20; Jun 21, 2023 $0.22; Sep 20, 2023 $0.22; Dec 6, 2023 $0.25; Mar 20, 2024 $0.20; Jun 26, 2024 $0.27; Sep 25, 2024 $0.25; Dec 11, 2024 $0.26; Mar 26, 2025 $0.25; Jun 25, 2025 $0.26; Sep 24, 2025 $0.26; Dec 10, 2025 $0.28; Mar 25, 2026 $0.26; Jun 24, 2026 $0.25; Sep 23, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VIGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VIG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2017 $0.43; Jun 21, 2017 $0.52; Sep 20, 2017 $0.43; Dec 21, 2017 $0.55; Mar 26, 2018 $0.40; Jun 28, 2018 $0.57; Sep 26, 2018 $0.50; Dec 17, 2018 $0.58; Mar 28, 2019 $0.51; Jun 17, 2019 $0.47; Sep 24, 2019 $0.55; Dec 18, 2019 $0.60; Mar 26, 2020 $0.47; Jun 29, 2020 $0.60; Sep 29, 2020 $0.56; Dec 21, 2020 $0.66; Mar 22, 2021 $0.51; Jun 21, 2021 $0.68; Sep 20, 2021 $0.70; Dec 20, 2021 $0.77; Mar 21, 2022 $0.69; Jun 21, 2022 $0.69; Sep 19, 2022 $0.72; Dec 20, 2022 $0.87; Mar 24, 2023 $0.75; Jun 29, 2023 $0.77; Sep 28, 2023 $0.77; Dec 21, 2023 $0.92; Mar 22, 2024 $0.77; Jun 28, 2024 $0.90; Sep 27, 2024 $0.84; Dec 23, 2024 $0.88; Mar 27, 2025 $0.94; Jun 30, 2025 $0.87; Sep 29, 2025 $0.86; Dec 22, 2025 $0.88; Mar 27, 2026 $0.83; Jun 26, 2026 $1.00; Sep 28, 2026 $0.93. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

SCHD vs VIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SCHD
  • VIG
Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 6, 2026. Worst fall: VIG −20.4% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SCHD 14.3%VIG 10.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SCHD 1.08VIG 1.33, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SCHD −16.8%, betterVIG −20.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SCHD 0.58VIG 0.80

SCHD and VIG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SCHDAvsFDVVA

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF · Fidelity High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VIGAvsDGROA

    Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF · iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHDAvsDGROA

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF · iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VIGAvsFDVVA

    Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF · Fidelity High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHDAvsSPYDA

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VIGAvsDVYB

    Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF · iShares Select Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.