SCHO ranks 1st and SJLD 15th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
SCHO vs SJLD
SCHO −0.32pt a year
0.03%0.35%
SCHO 25161.8×the volume
4.55M181
SCHO vs SJLD Performance
+2.1%+2.8%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- SJLD 0.35%
- SCHO $15.7B
- SJLD $2M
- SCHO +2.1%
- SJLD +2.8%, better
- SCHO 4.18%
- SJLD 5.15%, better
- SCHO 97
- SJLD 10
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- SJLD 181 sh
- SCHO $24.01
- SJLD $24.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHO | SJLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D25 |
| Durability | A77Higher | F22 |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. SCHO and SJLD are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHOA
SJLDC
In short
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
SJLD A boutique take on the short-Treasury shelf: SJLD keeps duration short with T-bills and Treasuries, but can also reach into exchange-listed debt, a wrinkle the giant index funds in this corner don't have.
Stated mandate
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
SJLD Seeks income while maintaining low duration by investing primarily in short-duration U.S. Treasury securities, Treasury bills and exchange-traded debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHO vs SJLD Holdings
How SCHO and SJLD differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for SCHO and SJLD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SCHOMore in SJLD | SCHO | SJLD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SCHO14.3%
- SJLD100.0%
- SCHO97
- SJLD8
Asset class
- SCHO
- Fixed Income
- SJLD
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. SCHO holds 97 securities, SJLD 8.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHO vs SJLD Cost
Overpaying SJLD vs SCHO
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHO 0.03%
$638
SJLD 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHO | SJLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $634 | $579 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,454 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $638 | $7,126 | $6,488 |
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- 0.35%SJLD
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
SJLD 14th cheapest of 15 funds
SCHO vs SJLD Dividends
- SCHO 4.18%
- SJLD 5.15%, better
- SCHO $1.00
- SJLD $1.28
- SCHO $0.08
- SJLD $0.39
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- SJLD Sep 15, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- SJLD Sep 16, 2026
- SCHO Monthly
- SJLD Quarterly
Distribution history
SCHO vs SJLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHO 1.7%SJLD 1.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHO −0.17SJLD −0.02
- Worst fall
- SCHO −5.4%SJLD −1.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHO 0.23SJLD 0.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.