SCHO ranks 1st and SLDR 8th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
SCHO vs SLDR
SCHO −0.09pt a year
0.03%0.12%
SCHO 458.9×the volume
4.55M9.92K
SCHO vs SLDR Performance
+2.1%+2.1%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- SLDR 0.12%
- SCHO $15.7B
- SLDR $38M
- SCHO +2.1%
- SLDR +2.1%
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- SLDR 3.94%
- SCHO 97
- SLDR 92
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- SLDR 9.92K sh
- SCHO $24.01
- SLDR $49.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHO | SLDR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C54 |
| Durability | A77Higher | F22 |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. SCHO and SLDR are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHOA
SLDRB
In short
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
SLDR A bond ladder in one ticker. SLDR spreads equal-weighted rungs across Treasury notes maturing in one to three years, so paper keeps rolling off and getting replaced without you running a spreadsheet of maturity dates.
Stated mandate
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
SLDR The fund seeks investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHO vs SLDR Holdings
How SCHO and SLDR differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for SCHO and SLDR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SCHOMore in SLDR | SCHO | SLDR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SCHO14.3%
- SLDR26.1%
- SCHO97
- SLDR91
Asset class
- SCHO
- Fixed Income
- SLDR
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. SCHO holds 97 securities, SLDR 91.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHO vs SLDR Cost
Overpaying SLDR vs SCHO
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHO 0.03%
$638
SLDR 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHO | SLDR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $220 | $165 |
| 20 | $216 | $859 | $643 |
| 30 | $638 | $2,520 | $1,882 |
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- 0.12%SLDR
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
SLDR 7th cheapest of 15 funds
SCHO vs SLDR Dividends
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- SLDR 3.94%
- SCHO $1.00
- SLDR $1.95
- SCHO $0.08
- SLDR $0.15
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- SLDR Nov 2, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- SLDR Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCHO Monthly
- SLDR Monthly
Distribution history
SCHO vs SLDR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHO 1.7%SLDR 1.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHO −0.17SLDR −1.02
- Worst fall
- SCHO −5.4%SLDR −0.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHO 0.23SLDR 0.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.