SCHQ ranks 2nd and XTEN 3rd of 6 funds in the Treasuries (10-20 Year) Category.
SCHQ vs XTEN
SCHQ −0.05pt a year
0.03%0.08%
SCHQ 3.5×the volume
1.08M311K
XTEN +0.6pt
+4.3%+4.9%
SCHQ vs XTEN Performance
−4.3%−2.3%
- SCHQ 0.03%, better
- XTEN 0.08%
- SCHQ $932M
- XTEN $1.39B
- SCHQ −4.3%
- XTEN −2.3%, better
- SCHQ 4.86%, better
- XTEN 4.46%
- SCHQ 102
- XTEN 74
- SCHQ 1.08M sh, better
- XTEN 311K sh
- SCHQ $29.81
- XTEN $43.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHQ | XTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A98 |
| Risk | D39 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D39 |
| Durability | C53 | B57Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (10-20 Year) funds
Same Category. SCHQ and XTEN are both graded against the same 6 Treasuries (10-20 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHQA
XTENB
In short
SCHQ The long end of the Treasury curve in a three-basis-point wrapper. SCHQ owns only long-dated US government bonds, so interest rates are the whole story here: no credit calls, no stock picking, just duration.
XTEN Most Treasury ETFs sort bonds by maturity and let duration drift. XTEN blends two duration buckets and rebalances monthly to hold a 10-year duration target, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
SCHQ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing the long-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
XTEN The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury securities with a duration between 6 and 14 years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHQ vs XTEN Holdings
How SCHQ and XTEN differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for SCHQ and XTEN.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SCHQMore in XTEN | SCHQ | XTEN |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SCHQ20.8%
- XTEN34.9%
- SCHQ102
- XTEN73
Asset class
- SCHQ
- Fixed Income
- XTEN
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. SCHQ holds 102 securities, XTEN 73.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHQ vs XTEN Cost
Overpaying XTEN vs SCHQ
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHQ 0.03%
$638
XTEN 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHQ | XTEN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $147 | $92 |
| 20 | $216 | $575 | $359 |
| 30 | $638 | $1,689 | $1,051 |
- 0.03%SCHQ, cheaper
- 0.08%XTEN
- Middle half of Treasuries (10-20 Year) funds
- Median 0.10%
SCHQ cheapest of 6 funds
XTEN 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
SCHQ vs XTEN Dividends
- SCHQ 4.86%, better
- XTEN 4.46%
- SCHQ $1.45
- XTEN $1.96
- SCHQ $0.11
- XTEN $0.15
- SCHQ Oct 1, 2026
- XTEN Oct 1, 2026
- SCHQ Oct 7, 2026
- XTEN Oct 6, 2026
- SCHQ Monthly
- XTEN Monthly
Distribution history
SCHQ vs XTEN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHQ 12.3%XTEN 8.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHQ 0.04XTEN 0.08, better
- Worst fall
- SCHQ −40.9%XTEN −13.8%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHQ 2.24XTEN 1.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.