SCHZ ranks 2nd and TAGG 17th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCHZ vs TAGG
SCHZ −0.05pt a year
0.03%0.08%
SCHZ 10.8×the volume
2.37M219K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
−0.2%−0.2%
SCHZ vs TAGG Performance
−1.0%−0.9%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- TAGG 0.08%
- SCHZ $10.8B
- TAGG $2.76B
- SCHZ −0.2%
- TAGG −0.2%
- SCHZ 4.27%
- TAGG 4.62%, better
- SCHZ 12610
- TAGG 1870
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- TAGG 219K sh
- SCHZ $22.54
- TAGG $41.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHZ | TAGG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A88 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A70 |
| Durability | A88Higher | A71 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCHZ and TAGG are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHZA
TAGGA
In short
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
TAGG Active bond management at index-fund pricing. T. Rowe Price runs quant models plus human credit research across roughly 600 U.S. investment-grade bonds, aiming to beat the Agg rather than copy it, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
TAGG The fund seeks total returns above the U.S. investment-grade bond market by investing primarily in U.S. bonds and using quantitative models alongside fundamental bond research.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHZ vs TAGG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHZ vs TAGG Cost
Overpaying TAGG vs SCHZ
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
TAGG 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHZ | TAGG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $147 | $92 |
| 20 | $216 | $575 | $359 |
| 30 | $638 | $1,689 | $1,051 |
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- 0.08%TAGG
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
TAGG 15th cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ vs TAGG Dividends
- SCHZ 4.27%
- TAGG 4.62%, better
- SCHZ $0.96
- TAGG $1.90
- SCHZ $0.08
- TAGG $0.16
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- TAGG Oct 27, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- TAGG Oct 29, 2026
- SCHZ Monthly
- TAGG Monthly
Distribution history
SCHZ vs TAGG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHZ
- TAGG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHZ 5.6%, betterTAGG 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHZ 0.17TAGG 0.22, better
- Worst fall
- SCHZ −17.5%, betterTAGG −18.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHZ 0.99TAGG 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
