SCHZ ranks 2nd and TPLS 78th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SCHZ vs TPLS
SCHZ −0.42pt a year
0.03%0.45%
SCHZ 195.0×the volume
2.37M12.1K
SCHZ vs TPLS Performance
−0.2%0.0%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- TPLS 0.45%
- SCHZ $10.8B
- TPLS $20M
- SCHZ −0.2%
- TPLS 0.0%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- TPLS 4.94%, better
- SCHZ 12610
- TPLS 369
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- TPLS 12.1K sh
- SCHZ $22.54
- TPLS $24.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHZ | TPLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F24 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A97 |
| Risk | C47 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A88Higher | D31 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SCHZ and TPLS are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHZA
TPLSC
In short
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
TPLS Thornburg's 2025 debut in the crowded aggregate-bond aisle, and it refuses to stay in the aisle: an active core-plus mandate that can wander into emerging market bonds, bank loans and structured debt, paying monthly.
Stated mandate
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
TPLS The fund invests in a diversified portfolio of fixed-income instruments, including emerging market bonds, bank loans, and loan participants.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHZ vs TPLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHZ vs TPLS Cost
Overpaying TPLS vs SCHZ
$8,403
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
TPLS 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHZ | TPLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $812 | $757 |
| 20 | $216 | $3,128 | $2,912 |
| 30 | $638 | $9,041 | $8,403 |
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- 0.45%TPLS
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
TPLS 84th cheapest of 114 funds
SCHZ vs TPLS Dividends
- SCHZ 4.27%
- TPLS 4.94%, better
- SCHZ $0.96
- TPLS $1.21
- SCHZ $0.08
- TPLS $0.09
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- TPLS Oct 29, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- TPLS Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Monthly
- TPLS Monthly
Distribution history
SCHZ vs TPLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHZ 5.6%TPLS 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHZ 0.17TPLS −0.38
- Worst fall
- SCHZ −17.5%TPLS −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHZ 0.99TPLS 0.07
SCHZ and TPLS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
