VTEB ranks 1st and SCNM 45th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
SCNM vs VTEB
VTEB −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
VTEB 612.4×the volume
28.9K17.7M
SCNM vs VTEB Performance
+0.4%+0.8%
- SCNM 0.35%
- VTEB 0.03%, better
- SCNM $244M
- VTEB $49.6B
- SCNM
- VTEB +1.3%
- SCNM
- VTEB 3.45%
- SCNM 99
- VTEB 11156
- SCNM 28.9K sh
- VTEB 17.7M sh, better
- SCNM $24.44
- VTEB $49.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCNM | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B59 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A86Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A95Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. SCNM and VTEB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCNMC
VTEBA
In short
SCNM A boutique shop's take on national munis: income exempt from regular federal income taxes with capital preservation as the second job, measured against the Bloomberg U.S. Municipal Index. It opened in December 2025.
VTEB Vanguard's national muni index fund, running since 2015 at three basis points, a tenth of what the typical muni ETF charges. Its benchmark screens for investment-grade bonds whose income is exempt from federal tax and the AMT.
Stated mandate
SCNM The Fund seeks current income exempt from regular federal income taxes while preserving capital.
VTEB VTEB seeks to track an index measuring the investment-grade segment of the U.S. municipal bond market. It uses passive sampling to approximate the index and generally invests in federally tax-exempt municipal securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCNM vs VTEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCNM vs VTEB Cost
Overpaying SCNM vs VTEB
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCNM 0.35%
$7,126
VTEB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCNM | VTEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%SCNM
- 0.03%VTEB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VTEB cheapest of 63 funds
SCNM 37th cheapest of 63 funds
SCNM vs VTEB Dividends
- SCNM
- VTEB 3.45%
- SCNM
- VTEB $1.70
- SCNM $0.08
- VTEB $0.14
- SCNM Nov 2, 2026
- VTEB Nov 2, 2026
- SCNM Nov 4, 2026
- VTEB Nov 4, 2026
- SCNM Monthly
- VTEB Monthly
Distribution history
SCNM vs VTEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCNM VTEB 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCNM VTEB −0.004
- Worst fall
- SCNM VTEB −12.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SCNM 0.13VTEB 0.95
SCNM and VTEB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





