MUB ranks 3rd and SCNM 45th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs SCNM
MUB −0.30pt a year
0.05%0.35%
MUB 333.9×the volume
9.65M28.9K
MUB vs SCNM Performance
+0.7%+0.4%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- SCNM 0.35%
- MUB $55B
- SCNM $244M
- MUB +1.1%
- SCNM
- MUB 3.26%
- SCNM
- MUB 7990
- SCNM 99
- MUB 9.65M sh, better
- SCNM 28.9K sh
- MUB $104.86
- SCNM $24.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | SCNM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A92 |
| Risk | B56 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A93Higher | C41 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and SCNM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
SCNMC
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
SCNM A boutique shop's take on national munis: income exempt from regular federal income taxes with capital preservation as the second job, measured against the Bloomberg U.S. Municipal Index. It opened in December 2025.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
SCNM The Fund seeks current income exempt from regular federal income taxes while preserving capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs SCNM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs SCNM Cost
Overpaying SCNM vs MUB
$6,066
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
SCNM 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | SCNM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $634 | $542 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,454 | $2,094 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $7,126 | $6,066 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.35%SCNM
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
SCNM 37th cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs SCNM Dividends
- MUB 3.26%
- SCNM
- MUB $3.42
- SCNM
- MUB $0.28
- SCNM $0.08
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- SCNM Nov 2, 2026
- MUB Nov 5, 2026
- SCNM Nov 4, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- SCNM Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs SCNM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%SCNM
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03SCNM
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%SCNM
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90SCNM 0.13
MUB and SCNM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





