XHLF ranks 7th and SCUS 25th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
SCUS vs XHLF
XHLF −0.11pt a year
0.14%0.03%
XHLF 2.5×the volume
124K304K
SCUS vs XHLF Performance
+3.5%+3.6%
- SCUS 0.14%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- SCUS $263M
- XHLF $2.03B
- SCUS +3.5%
- XHLF +3.6%, better
- SCUS 3.92%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- SCUS 140
- XHLF 29
- SCUS 124K sh
- XHLF 304K sh, better
- SCUS $25.05
- XHLF $50.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCUS | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | C44 |
| Tradability | C41 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C47 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. SCUS and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCUSB
XHLFA
In short
SCUS Schwab's cash-parking entry: an actively managed sleeve of short-dated investment-grade dollar debt, measured against 3-month T-bills, at 0.14% a year. That undercuts the typical ultra-short bond ETF, and most active ones too.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
SCUS The fund seeks current income consistent with capital preservation while maintaining liquidity. It actively invests in investment-grade, short-term, U.S.-dollar-denominated debt securities issued by U.S. and foreign issuers.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCUS vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCUS vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying SCUS vs XHLF
$2,294
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCUS 0.14%
$2,932
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCUS | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $256 | $55 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,000 | $216 | $784 |
| 30 | $2,932 | $638 | $2,294 |
- 0.14%SCUS
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
SCUS 20th cheapest of 78 funds
SCUS vs XHLF Dividends
- SCUS 3.92%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- SCUS $0.98
- XHLF $1.85
- SCUS $0.09
- XHLF $0.16
- SCUS Nov 2, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- SCUS Pays Nov 6, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCUS Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
SCUS vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCUS 0.4%XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCUS −0.11XHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- SCUS −0.2%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SCUS 0.01XHLF 0.03
SCUS and XHLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.14% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
