SFGV ranks 3rd and WCMG 13th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
SFGV vs WCMG
SFGV −0.52pt a year
0.33%0.85%
SFGV 5.9×the volume
13.4K2.28K
SFGV vs WCMG Performance
−0.3%−6.9%
- SFGV 0.33%, better
- WCMG 0.85%
- SFGV $1.19B
- WCMG $4M
- SFGV +20.3%
- WCMG
- SFGV 2.21%
- WCMG
- SFGV 518
- WCMG 47
- SFGV 13.4K sh, better
- WCMG 2.28K sh
- SFGV $36.38
- WCMG $19.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SFGV | WCMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | D29 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | F20 |
| Tradability | B56Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | C42 | C49Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | D34 |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. SFGV and WCMG are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SFGVA
WCMGD
In short
SFGV A wealth manager's global value model in ETF clothing: SFGV hunts profitable companies with cheap cash flows and a habit of paying shareholders back, at 0.33% net of a waiver through March 31, 2027, below most global value rivals.
WCMG A stock picker's take on global equity: WCM hunts industry leaders with widening competitive advantages at prices it finds attractive, across US, developed, emerging and frontier markets. MSCI ACWI is the yardstick here, not the rulebook.
Stated mandate
SFGV The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
WCMG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of companies worldwide, including the United States.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SFGV vs WCMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SFGV vs WCMG Cost
Overpaying WCMG vs SFGV
$9,462
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SFGV 0.33%
$6,737
WCMG 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SFGV | WCMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $1,508 | $910 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $5,706 | $3,388 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $16,199 | $9,462 |
- 0.33%SFGV, cheaper
- 0.85%WCMG
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
SFGV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
WCMG 11th cheapest of 15 funds
SFGV vs WCMG Dividends
- SFGV 2.21%
- WCMG
- SFGV $0.80
- WCMG None
- SFGV $0.14
- WCMG
- SFGV Sep 28, 2026
- WCMG
- SFGV Sep 30, 2026
- WCMG
- SFGV Quarterly
- WCMG
Distribution history
SFGV vs WCMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SFGV 10.6%WCMG
- Return per unit of risk
- SFGV 1.02WCMG
- Worst fall
- SFGV −14.5%WCMG
- Market sensitivity
- SFGV 0.59WCMG 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.