SGDM ranks 2nd and SLVR 16th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
SGDM vs SLVR
SGDM −0.19pt a year
0.46%0.65%
SLVR 3.4×the volume
36.1K124K
SGDM vs SLVR Performance
+12.4%+6.5%
- SGDM 0.46%, better
- SLVR 0.65%
- SGDM $568M
- SLVR $555M
- SGDM +12.4%, better
- SLVR +6.5%
- SGDM 1.12%
- SLVR
- SGDM 49
- SLVR 77
- SGDM 36.1K sh
- SLVR 124K sh, better
- SGDM $64.96
- SLVR $44.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SGDM | SLVR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | D26 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B56 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B60Higher | C43 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. SGDM and SLVR are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SGDMB
SLVRD
In short
SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.
SLVR Most silver funds make you choose: the metal or the miners. SLVR holds both, tracking an index of silver-mining companies alongside physical-silver trusts, in a peer group where 'precious metals miners' usually means gold.
Stated mandate
SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.
SLVR The Fund seeks to track an index focused on silver-mining companies and physical-silver trusts. It normally invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SGDM vs SLVR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SGDM vs SLVR Cost
Overpaying SLVR vs SGDM
$3,487
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SGDM 0.46%
$9,230
SLVR 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SGDM | SLVR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $830 | $1,163 | $333 |
| 20 | $3,195 | $4,440 | $1,245 |
| 30 | $9,230 | $12,717 | $3,487 |
- 0.46%SGDM, cheaper
- 0.65%SLVR
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
SLVR 12th cheapest of 18 funds
SGDM vs SLVR Dividends
- SGDM 1.12%
- SLVR
- SGDM $0.73
- SLVR
- SGDM $0.73
- SLVR $2.05
- SGDM Dec 18, 2025
- SLVR Dec 18, 2025
- SGDM Dec 22, 2025
- SLVR Dec 22, 2025
- SGDM Annual
- SLVR Irregular
Distribution history
SGDM vs SLVR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SGDM 40.0%SLVR 57.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SGDM 0.97SLVR 0.95
- Worst fall
- SGDM −45.0%SLVR −47.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SGDM 0.71SLVR 1.02
SGDM and SLVR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

