SIZE ranks 3rd and SUSA 5th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
SIZE vs SUSA
SIZE −0.10pt a year
0.15%0.25%
SUSA 7.6×the volume
5.21K39.6K
SUSA +2.9pt
+12.0%+14.9%
SIZE vs SUSA Performance
+43.6%+59.2%
- SIZE 0.15%, better
- SUSA 0.25%
- SIZE $433M
- SUSA $4.03B
- SIZE +13.8%, better
- SUSA +12.1%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- SUSA 0.84%
- SIZE 518
- SUSA 206
- SIZE 5.21K sh
- SUSA 39.6K sh, better
- SIZE $180.22
- SUSA $155.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIZE | SUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B66Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | F23 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B56 |
| Durability | B57 | A74Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. SIZE and SUSA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIZEA
SUSAA
In short
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
SUSA One of the original US ESG funds, running since 2005. Its index is sector-neutral, so the screening happens inside each sector instead of turning into one giant bet against energy.
Stated mandate
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
SUSA The fund seeks to track a sector-neutral index of U.S. large- and mid-cap companies with positive aggregate ESG ratings and extensive screens for controversial activities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIZE vs SUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIZE vs SUSA Cost
Overpaying SUSA vs SIZE
$2,022
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
SUSA 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIZE | SUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $455 | $181 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,769 | $698 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $5,159 | $2,022 |
- 0.15%SIZE, cheaper
- 0.25%SUSA
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
SUSA 10th cheapest of 30 funds
SIZE vs SUSA Dividends
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- SUSA 0.84%
- SIZE $2.47
- SUSA $1.30
- SIZE $0.65
- SUSA $0.34
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- SUSA Sep 15, 2026
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- SUSA Sep 18, 2026
- SIZE Quarterly
- SUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
SIZE vs SUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SIZE
- SUSA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIZE 13.0%SUSA 12.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SIZE 1.06SUSA 1.31, better
- Worst fall
- SIZE −24.0%, betterSUSA −28.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SIZE 0.97SUSA 1.06
SIZE and SUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
