TSMG ranks 1st and SKHL 57th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
SKHL vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.21pt a year
0.97%0.76%
SKHL 32.9×the volume
2.27M69K
SKHL vs TSMG Performance
−11.3%−7.6%
- SKHL 0.97%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- SKHL $38M
- TSMG $28M
- SKHL
- TSMG +36.4%
- SKHL 5
- TSMG 5
- SKHL 2.27M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- SKHL $6.62
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SKHL | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | B58 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B60 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. SKHL and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SKHLB
TSMGA
In short
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SKHL vs TSMG Holdings
How SKHL and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SKHL and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SKHL and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SKHL.
Concentration
- SKHL100.0%
- TSMG214.6%
- SKHL0
- TSMG1
Asset class
- SKHL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in SKHL0
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in SKHL
0 securities, 0.0% of SKHL by weight
Only in TSMG
1 security, 14.6% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204014.59%
Weight gaps
SKHL and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SKHL vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying SKHL vs TSMG
$3,542
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SKHL 0.97%
$18,198
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SKHL | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,353 | $359 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,142 | $1,301 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,656 | $3,542 |
- 0.97%SKHL
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
SKHL 156th cheapest of 315 funds
SKHL vs TSMG Dividends
- SKHL $0.04
- TSMG $2.73
- SKHL Sep 22, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- SKHL Sep 29, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- SKHL Irregular
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
SKHL vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SKHL TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SKHL TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- SKHL TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SKHL 0.00TSMG 3.81
SKHL and TSMG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


