XHLF ranks 7th and SLWS 69th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
SLWS vs XHLF
XHLF −0.39pt a year
0.42%0.03%
XHLF 73.8×the volume
4.12K304K
SLWS vs XHLF Performance
+3.0%+2.9%
- SLWS 0.42%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- SLWS $400M
- XHLF $2.03B
- SLWS
- XHLF +3.6%
- SLWS
- XHLF 3.68%
- SLWS 214
- XHLF 29
- SLWS 4.12K sh
- XHLF 304K sh, better
- SLWS $100.40
- XHLF $50.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SLWS | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B68 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C52Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | F12 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C46 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. SLWS and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SLWSD
XHLFA
In short
SLWS Most ultra-short bond funds are index-run Treasury parking lots. SLWS is a young, actively managed take: a human-picked short-duration portfolio that can roam into international and emerging-market debt while keeping duration near a year or less.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
SLWS The Fund seeks to preserve capital and provide liquidity while generating risk-managed income. It pursues this through actively managed fixed-income investments, with an emphasis on low volatility and a normal duration of one year or less.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SLWS vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SLWS vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying SLWS vs XHLF
$7,834
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SLWS 0.42%
$8,472
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SLWS | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $55 | $704 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $216 | $2,711 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $638 | $7,834 |
- 0.42%SLWS
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
SLWS 75th cheapest of 78 funds
SLWS vs XHLF Dividends
- SLWS
- XHLF 3.68%
- SLWS
- XHLF $1.85
- SLWS $0.39
- XHLF $0.16
- SLWS Oct 29, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- SLWS Oct 30, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SLWS Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
SLWS vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SLWS XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SLWS XHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- SLWS XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SLWS 0.04XHLF 0.03
SLWS and XHLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
