SUB ranks 2nd and SMB 5th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
SMB vs SUB
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.07%0.07%
SUB 4.8×the volume
179K860K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+1.5%+1.5%
SMB vs SUB Performance
+6.7%+8.3%
- SMB 0.07%
- SUB 0.07%
- SMB $394M
- SUB $13.3B
- SMB +2.0%
- SUB +2.1%, better
- SMB 2.82%, better
- SUB 2.57%
- SMB 362
- SUB 3188
- SMB 179K sh
- SUB 860K sh, better
- SMB $17.18
- SUB $105.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMB | SUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91 | A91 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C40 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A94Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. SMB and SUB are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMBA
SUBA
In short
SMB A muni fund built for the short end: VanEck has run this AMT-free, short-maturity national portfolio since 2008, and it charges 0.07%, a fraction of what the typical muni bond ETF costs.
SUB Munis, but only the near end of the curve. Since 2008 SUB has tracked an AMT-free index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing inside five years, paying tax-exempt income monthly with far less rate sensitivity than long-dated muni funds.
Stated mandate
SMB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ICE Short AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index before fees and expenses.
SUB The fund seeks to track an index of short-term, investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds maturing from one month through five years, providing tax-exempt income while managing interest-rate risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMB vs SUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMB vs SUB Cost
Same expense ratio
$1,480
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMB 0.07%
$1,480
SUB 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMB | SUB |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $128 |
| 20 | $503 | $503 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $1,480 |
- 0.07%SMB
- 0.07%SUB
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
SMB 3rd cheapest of 27 funds
SUB 3rd cheapest of 27 funds
SMB vs SUB Dividends
- SMB 2.82%, better
- SUB 2.57%
- SMB $0.48
- SUB $2.73
- SMB $0.04
- SUB $0.23
- SMB Oct 1, 2026
- SUB Oct 1, 2026
- SMB Oct 6, 2026
- SUB Oct 6, 2026
- SMB Monthly
- SUB Monthly
Distribution history
SMB vs SUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SMB
- SUB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMB 2.5%SUB 2.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMB −0.33, betterSUB −0.59
- Worst fall
- SMB −7.1%SUB −4.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SMB 0.33SUB 0.26
SMB and SUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

