UNHG ranks 2nd and SOFA 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
SOFA vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
UNHG −0.20pt a year
0.97%0.77%
UNHG 9.2×the volume
78.8K726K
SOFA vs UNHG Performance
−5.1%−8.1%
- SOFA 0.97%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- SOFA $13M
- UNHG $63M
- SOFA
- UNHG +11.9%
- SOFA 8
- UNHG 5
- SOFA 78.8K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- SOFA $12.55
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOFA | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A90Higher |
| Risk | B60 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B64 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. SOFA and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOFAC
UNHGA
In short
SOFA Two ETFs chase 2x the daily move in SoFi stock. SOFA is the cheaper one at 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027. A one-day instrument with a daily reset, not a set-and-forget stake in the stock.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
SOFA The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s common shares.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOFA vs UNHG Holdings
How SOFA and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SOFA and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SOFA and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SOFAMore in UNHG | SOFA | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SOFA100.0%
- UNHG212.0%
- SOFA3
- UNHG1
Asset class
- SOFA
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in SOFA3
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in SOFA
3 securities, 17.7% of SOFA by weight
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut8.41%
- Sofi Technologies Inc7.43%
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5061.85%
Only in UNHG
1 security, 12.0% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204011.99%
Weight gaps
SOFA and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOFA vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying SOFA vs UNHG
$3,369
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOFA 0.97%
$18,198
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOFA | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,371 | $341 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,205 | $1,238 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,829 | $3,369 |
- 0.97%SOFA
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
SOFA 156th cheapest of 315 funds
SOFA vs UNHG Dividends
- SOFA $0.06
- UNHG $1.90
- SOFA Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- SOFA Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- SOFA Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
SOFA vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOFA UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- SOFA UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- SOFA UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SOFA 1.96UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.