TSMG ranks 1st and SOFA 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
SOFA vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.21pt a year
0.97%0.76%
SOFA 1.1×the volume
78.8K69K
SOFA vs TSMG Performance
−5.1%−4.6%
- SOFA 0.97%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- SOFA $13M
- TSMG $28M
- SOFA
- TSMG +40.8%
- SOFA 8
- TSMG 5
- SOFA 78.8K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- SOFA $12.55
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOFA | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A87Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B60 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B64 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. SOFA and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOFAC
TSMGA
In short
SOFA Two ETFs chase 2x the daily move in SoFi stock. SOFA is the cheaper one at 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027. A one-day instrument with a daily reset, not a set-and-forget stake in the stock.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
SOFA The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s common shares.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOFA vs TSMG Holdings
How SOFA and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SOFA and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SOFA and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SOFAMore in TSMG | SOFA | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SOFA100.0%
- TSMG212.4%
- SOFA3
- TSMG1
Asset class
- SOFA
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in SOFA3
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in SOFA
3 securities, 17.7% of SOFA by weight
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut8.41%
- Sofi Technologies Inc7.43%
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5061.85%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 12.4% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.41%
Weight gaps
SOFA and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOFA vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying SOFA vs TSMG
$3,542
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOFA 0.97%
$18,198
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOFA | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,353 | $359 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,142 | $1,301 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,656 | $3,542 |
- 0.97%SOFA
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
SOFA 156th cheapest of 315 funds
SOFA vs TSMG Dividends
- SOFA $0.06
- TSMG $2.73
- SOFA Sep 22, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- SOFA Sep 29, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- SOFA Quarterly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
SOFA vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOFA TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SOFA TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- SOFA TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SOFA 1.96TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.