USCA ranks 2nd and SPHB 17th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
SPHB vs USCA
USCA −0.18pt a year
0.25%0.07%
SPHB 3.3×the volume
321K97.9K
SPHB +8.5pt
+29.8%+21.3%
SPHB vs USCA Performance
+20.1%+6.8%
- SPHB 0.25%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- SPHB $817M
- USCA $3.42B
- SPHB +20.1%, better
- USCA +6.8%
- SPHB 0.55%
- USCA 1.06%, better
- SPHB 100
- USCA 392
- SPHB 321K sh, better
- USCA 97.9K sh
- SPHB $137.37
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPHB | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A97Higher |
| Mission | F13 | A91Higher |
| Risk | D28 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B55Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. SPHB and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPHBC
USCAA
In short
SPHB The S&P 500 with the volume knob turned up. SPHB holds about 100 of the index's most market-sensitive names, amplifying the market's swings in both directions using plain stocks, not leverage.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
SPHB The Fund is based on the S&P 500® High Beta Index.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPHB vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPHB vs USCA Cost
Overpaying SPHB vs USCA
$3,679
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPHB 0.25%
$5,159
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPHB | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $128 | $327 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $503 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $1,480 | $3,679 |
- 0.25%SPHB
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
SPHB 10th cheapest of 30 funds
SPHB vs USCA Dividends
- SPHB 0.55%
- USCA 1.06%, better
- SPHB $0.76
- USCA $0.47
- SPHB $0.14
- USCA $0.10
- SPHB Sep 21, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- SPHB Sep 25, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- SPHB Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
SPHB vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPHB 22.6%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SPHB 1.08USCA 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- SPHB −31.5%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SPHB 1.44USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.