SVXY ranks 1st and YCS 5th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
SVXY vs YCS
100%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
SVXY 64.0×the volume
1.49M23.3K
YCS +14.5pt
−1.7%+12.8%
SVXY vs YCS Performance
+96.6%+166.0%
- SVXY 0.95%
- YCS 0.95%
- SVXY $201M
- YCS $27M
- SVXY +21.9%, better
- YCS +11.7%
- SVXY 1
- YCS 1
- SVXY 1.49M sh, better
- YCS 23.3K sh
- SVXY $60.55
- YCS $54.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SVXY | YCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A75 | A88Higher |
| Tradability | A84Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76Higher | B59 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. SVXY and YCS are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SVXYB
YCSB
In short
SVXY Short volatility, half dose. SVXY targets one-half the inverse of a VIX short-term futures index each day, a deliberately de-tuned take on the short-vol trade, and it has run that mandate since 2011.
YCS A 2008-vintage ProShares fund built for one job: expressing a bearish yen view at twice the daily move, in a brokerage account, without an FX platform or margin desk. Currency trading, ticker-sized.
Stated mandate
SVXY SVXY seeks daily results equal to one-half the inverse of the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index. Its objective is measured daily, so returns over longer periods can differ from the stated daily target.
YCS YCS seeks daily results corresponding to -2 times the daily performance of the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SVXY vs YCS Holdings
How SVXY and YCS differ
100%
Shared holdings make up 100% of SVXY and 100% of YCS.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for SVXY and YCS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SVXY and YCS.
Concentration
- SVXY100.0%
- YCS100.0%
- SVXY0
- YCS0
Asset class
- SVXY
- Alternatives
- YCS
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in SVXY0
- In both0
- Only in YCS0
Only in SVXY
0 securities, 0.0% of SVXY by weight
Only in YCS
0 securities, 0.0% of YCS by weight
Weight gaps
SVXY and YCS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SVXY vs YCS Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SVXY 0.95%
$17,869
YCS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SVXY | YCS |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%SVXY
- 0.95%YCS
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
SVXY 6th cheapest of 53 funds
YCS 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SVXY vs YCS Dividends
- SVXY None
- YCS None
Distribution history
SVXY vs YCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SVXY
- YCS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SVXY 26.5%YCS 20.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SVXY 0.42YCS 0.42Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- SVXY −46.4%YCS −27.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SVXY 1.32YCS −0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.