SVXY ranks 1st and ZSL 23rd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
SVXY vs ZSL
100%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
ZSL 2.1×the volume
1.49M3.09M
SVXY +21.1pt
−1.2%−22.3%
SVXY vs ZSL Performance
+92.6%−64.5%
- SVXY 0.95%
- ZSL 0.95%
- SVXY $201M
- ZSL $66M
- SVXY +21.8%
- ZSL +182.9%, better
- SVXY 1
- ZSL 1
- SVXY 1.49M sh
- ZSL 3.09M sh, better
- SVXY $60.51
- ZSL $37.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SVXY | ZSL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A75Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. SVXY and ZSL are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SVXYB
ZSLC
In short
SVXY Short volatility, half dose. SVXY targets one-half the inverse of a VIX short-term futures index each day, a deliberately de-tuned take on the short-vol trade, and it has run that mandate since 2011.
ZSL Silver runs hot, and ZSL leans the other way. Live since 2008, it aims to deliver twice the inverse of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex's daily move, reset every day: a short-term trading tool in a corner with almost no rivals.
Stated mandate
SVXY SVXY seeks daily results equal to one-half the inverse of the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index. Its objective is measured daily, so returns over longer periods can differ from the stated daily target.
ZSL The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SVXY vs ZSL Holdings
How SVXY and ZSL differ
100%
Shared holdings make up 100% of SVXY and 100% of ZSL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SVXY and ZSL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SVXY and ZSL.
Concentration
- SVXY100.0%
- ZSL100.0%
- SVXY0
- ZSL0
Asset class
- SVXY
- Alternatives
- ZSL
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in SVXY0
- In both0
- Only in ZSL0
Only in SVXY
0 securities, 0.0% of SVXY by weight
Only in ZSL
0 securities, 0.0% of ZSL by weight
Weight gaps
SVXY and ZSL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SVXY vs ZSL Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SVXY 0.95%
$17,869
ZSL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SVXY | ZSL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%SVXY
- 0.95%ZSL
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
SVXY 6th cheapest of 53 funds
ZSL 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SVXY vs ZSL Dividends
- SVXY None
- ZSL None
Distribution history
SVXY vs ZSL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SVXY
- ZSL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SVXY 26.5%, betterZSL 212.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SVXY 0.42, betterZSL 0.30
- Worst fall
- SVXY −46.4%, betterZSL −98.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SVXY 1.32ZSL −1.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.