DOG ranks 1st and ZSL 23rd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs ZSL
5.9%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 1.5×the volume
4.77M3.09M
DOG +11.3pt
−11.0%−22.3%
DOG vs ZSL Performance
−20.6%−64.5%
- DOG 0.95%
- ZSL 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- ZSL $66M
- DOG −5.3%
- ZSL +182.9%, better
- DOG 3.16%
- ZSL
- DOG 3
- ZSL 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- ZSL 3.09M sh
- DOG $22.02
- ZSL $37.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | ZSL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and ZSL are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
ZSLC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
ZSL Silver runs hot, and ZSL leans the other way. Live since 2008, it aims to deliver twice the inverse of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex's daily move, reset every day: a short-term trading tool in a corner with almost no rivals.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
ZSL The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs ZSL Holdings
How DOG and ZSL differ
5.9%
Shared holdings make up 100% of ZSL and 5.9% of DOG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings5.9%
Sector
No Sector split for ZSL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ZSL.
Concentration
- DOG100.0%
- ZSL100.0%
- DOG2
- ZSL0
Asset class
- DOG
- Equity
- ZSL
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in DOG2
- In both0
- Only in ZSL0
Only in DOG
2 securities, 94.1% of DOG by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf89.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.45%
Only in ZSL
0 securities, 0.0% of ZSL by weight
Weight gaps
DOG and ZSL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs ZSL Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
ZSL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | ZSL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%ZSL
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
ZSL 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs ZSL Dividends
- DOG 3.16%
- ZSL
- DOG $0.69
- ZSL None
- DOG $0.17
- ZSL
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- ZSL
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- ZSL
- DOG Quarterly
- ZSL
Distribution history
DOG vs ZSL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- ZSL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterZSL 212.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21ZSL 0.30, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterZSL −98.9%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83ZSL −1.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.