Skip to content

TBFG vs UCBG

Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF

TBFGBNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

UCBGANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

UCBG −0.40pt a year

TBFG0.46%UCBG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

UCBG 2380.4×the volume

TBFG1.74KUCBG4.15M

TBFG vs UCBG Performance

Oct 2, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.1%TBFG−2.0%UCBG

Oct 2, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. TBFG −2.1%. UCBG −2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%−0.5%0%0.5%1%Oct 2Oct 16Nov 2
Expense ratio
TBFG 0.46%
UCBG 0.06%, better
Fund size
TBFG $378M
UCBG $2.52B
1Y total return
TBFG +9.1%
UCBG No data
Yield (12M)
TBFG 2.49%
UCBG No data
Holdings
TBFG 24
UCBG 868
Avg volume (30D)
TBFG 1.74K sh
UCBG 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
TBFG $32.04
UCBG $50.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TBFG: Cost 61, Risk 46, Mission 81, Tradability 41, Holdings 68, Durability 67. UCBG: Cost 100, Risk not scored, Mission 99, Tradability 99, Holdings 79, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for TBFG, UCBG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTBFGUCBG
Cost30% weightB61A100Higher
Mission25% weightA81A99Higher
Risk15% weightC46Not scored
Tradability15% weightC41A99Higher
Holdings10% weightB68A79Higher
Durability5% weightB67HigherB66

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TBFG and UCBG are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

UCBG ranks 1st and TBFG 10th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 10BDIALColumbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 10BTBFGBrinsmere Fund Growth ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 12BOCIOClearShares OCIO ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TBFGBBrinsmere Fund Growth ETF

UCBGAState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

In short

TBFG Three in-house models, run independently, decide what this global fund of funds holds. Launched in 2024, it is an allocation ETF where the mix shifts on the adviser's risk signals instead of sitting at a fixed 80/20 split.

UCBG No data

Stated mandate

TBFG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It systematically allocates among three adviser-developed strategies that rebalance underlying funds using proprietary risk-management techniques.

UCBG No data

Why people hold it

  • TBFG 0.46%, with no fee waiver propping it up, which lands below the median for its 37-fund allocation category.
  • Three proprietary strategies (SMB, CAAR and SIS) run independently and systematically rebalance the underlying funds on the adviser's risk-management rules.sec.gov
  • One ticket covers global equity and bond markets, US and international, and the fund pays distributions quarterly.sec.gov
  • A multi-hundred-million-dollar fund sitting in the upper half of a 37-fund allocation group, a decent showing for a 2024 launch.

UCBG No data

Worth knowing

  • TBFG The models cost something. Index-built rivals run cheaper: AOA at 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026, and UCBG at 0.06%.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's household names, so the spread at the moment you trade can matter as much as the yearly fee.
  • No index to check it against. The asset mix comes from the adviser's own signals and can look nothing like a static stock-bond portfolio.sec.gov

UCBG No data

Full TBFG profile⁠

Full UCBG profile⁠

TBFG vs UCBG Holdings

How TBFG and UCBG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of TBFG and 0.0% of UCBG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile79.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors86.8%

Sector

Sector weights in TBFG and UCBG, widest gap first
SectorMore in TBFGMore in UCBG
TechnologyUCBG +9.6 points
FinancialsTBFG +3.4 points
IndustrialsTBFG +3.1 points
MaterialsTBFG +2.8 points
EnergyTBFG +2.6 points
CommunicationUCBG +2.5 points
Real EstateTBFG +0.8 points
Health CareUCBG +0.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryUCBG +0.5 points
UtilitiesTBFG +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesTBFG +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in TBFG and UCBG, widest gap first
CountryMore in TBFGMore in UCBG
United StatesUCBG +19.7 points
JapanTBFG +4.0 points
TaiwanTBFG +2.0 points
South KoreaTBFG +1.5 points
United KingdomTBFG +1.3 points
SwitzerlandTBFG +1.1 points
CanadaTBFG +1.1 points
GermanyTBFG +0.9 points
Other countries (32)TBFG +7.6 points

Outside the US: TBFG 72% developed, 28% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • TBFG66.2%
  • UCBG33.6%

Securities held

  • TBFG23
  • UCBG866

Asset class

TBFG
Multi-Asset
UCBG
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in TBFG23
  • In both0
  • Only in UCBG866

Only in TBFG

23 securities, 100% of TBFG by weight

  • State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF12.59%
  • State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust8.47%
  • iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF8.03%

Only in UCBG

866 securities, 99.7% of UCBG by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp6.99%
  • Apple Inc6.89%
  • Microsoft Corp5.32%

Weight gaps

TBFG and UCBG share no securities.

All TBFG holdings⁠All 503 UCBG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TBFG vs UCBG Cost

Overpaying TBFG vs UCBG

$7,960

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TBFG 0.46%

    $9,230

  • UCBG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TBFG 0.46%
  • UCBG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TBFG $9,230UCBG $1,270

Year by year

YearTBFGUCBGOverpaying
10$830$110$720
20$3,195$432$2,763
30$9,230$1,270$7,960

Expense ratio

  • 0.46%TBFG
  • 0.06%UCBG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

UCBG cheapest of 37 funds

TBFG 15th cheapest of 37 funds

TBFG vs UCBG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
TBFG 2.49%
UCBG No data
Payout (12M)
TBFG $0.79
UCBG No data
Last payment
TBFG $0.14
UCBG $0.04
Ex-dividend
TBFG Sep 24, 2026
UCBG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
TBFG Sep 25, 2026
UCBG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
TBFG Quarterly
UCBG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

TBFGQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll TBFG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2024 $0.04; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Sep 27, 2024 $0.14; Dec 30, 2024 $0.35; Mar 25, 2025 $0.08; Jun 24, 2025 $0.13; Sep 23, 2025 $0.13; Dec 31, 2025 $0.45; Mar 26, 2026 $0.06; Jun 25, 2026 $0.13; Sep 24, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
UCBGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UCBG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

TBFG vs UCBG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TBFG 9.0%since Feb 2024UCBG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TBFG 0.79since Feb 2024UCBG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TBFG −13.4%since Jan 2024UCBG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TBFG 0.71UCBG 0.00

TBFG and UCBG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • TBFGBvsAOAA

    Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsAOAA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFGBvsIRTRA

    Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsIRTRA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFGBvsINCEA

    Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsINCEA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.