INCE ranks 4th and TBFG 10th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
INCE vs TBFG
INCE −0.17pt a year
0.29%0.46%
INCE 27.1×the volume
47.3K1.74K
INCE vs TBFG Performance
+22.8%+9.1%
- INCE 0.29%, better
- TBFG 0.46%
- INCE $368M
- TBFG $378M
- INCE +22.8%, better
- TBFG +9.1%
- INCE 4.96%, better
- TBFG 2.49%
- INCE 115
- TBFG 24
- INCE 47.3K sh, better
- TBFG 1.74K sh
- INCE $68.80
- TBFG $32.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INCE | TBFG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B67 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. INCE and TBFG are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INCEA
TBFGB
In short
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
TBFG Three in-house models, run independently, decide what this global fund of funds holds. Launched in 2024, it is an allocation ETF where the mix shifts on the adviser's risk signals instead of sitting at a fixed 80/20 split.
Stated mandate
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
TBFG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It systematically allocates among three adviser-developed strategies that rebalance underlying funds using proprietary risk-management techniques.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INCE vs TBFG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INCE vs TBFG Cost
Overpaying TBFG vs INCE
$3,278
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
TBFG 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INCE | TBFG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $830 | $303 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $3,195 | $1,151 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $9,230 | $3,278 |
- 0.29%INCE, cheaper
- 0.46%TBFG
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds
TBFG 15th cheapest of 37 funds
INCE vs TBFG Dividends
- INCE 4.96%, better
- TBFG 2.49%
- INCE $3.42
- TBFG $0.79
- INCE $0.30
- TBFG $0.14
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- TBFG Sep 24, 2026
- INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
- TBFG Sep 25, 2026
- INCE Monthly
- TBFG Quarterly
Distribution history
INCE vs TBFG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INCE 10.8%TBFG 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- INCE 1.28TBFG 0.79
- Worst fall
- INCE −18.4%TBFG −13.4%
- Market sensitivity
- INCE 0.60TBFG 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.